Comparison

WhatTheFont vs Playing Field

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

WhatTheFont

Instantly identify fonts from images. Simply upload a photo of a design, and this app will recognize the fonts and suggest matches. It's ideal for designers, crafters, and anyone curious about typography, helping you discover and try out new fonts.

Highlights
  • Identify fonts from photos
  • Suggests font matches
  • Type custom text in found fonts
  • Browse similar fonts
  • Font inspiration and learning
Features
Read full description

Identify fonts in a snap! Take a photo of a design you love - WhatTheFont recognizes the fonts and shows font matches. Great for designers, crafters, and anyone who loves typography. Perfect for when you see a great design and want to identify the fonts, or when your client sends you an image but doesn’t know what fonts were used. - Type out words in the fonts you find – enter your own text to try them out on the spot. - Get ideas and inspiration for font options for your own projects. - Learn the names of cool fonts. - Browse fonts similar to the one in your image. WhatTheFont is powered by AI, making it fast and easy to use. Brought to you by the friendly people at MyFonts.

About

Playing Field

Features
Read full description

playing field is: a platform for people to connect, and grow ideas. a toolkit for collaboration and co-creation.

Screenshots

WhatTheFont4 screens
Playing Field3 screens

Verdict

The call

WhatTheFont and Playing Field are too close to call on the numbers: across 5 compared parameters — price, ads, in-app purchases and device support among them — neither pulls far enough ahead to decide it. What separates them is feature set and interface, not measurable difference.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ScorecardNo meaningful differences
WhatTheFont versus Playing Field: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterWhatTheFontPlaying Field
PriceFreeFree
Rating2.4 (591 ratings) — better—
Positive reviews36.0% of reviews—
Number of ratings591 — better—
Update frequencyEvery 4 months—
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFree—
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPod — betteriPhone, iPod
Requires iOS15.515.1 — better
Further details — not scored
Size63 MB43 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperMyFonts Inc.Jamie Horsefield

Bugs and requests

WhatTheFont

Reported bugs

5 issues
  • Inability to accept terms and conditions
  • Compatibility issues with newer iOS versions
  • Endless loading and search failures
  • Corrupted image uploads
  • Incorrect font identification and suggestions

Requested features

5 requests
  • Ability to save identified fonts
  • Option to search for free font alternatives
  • Improved cropping and text selection tools
  • Landscape mode support
  • Better font database and matching algorithms

Playing Field

Not enough reviews yet to summarise bugs or requests.

In-app purchases

None

WhatTheFont

No in-app purchases

None

Playing Field

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is WhatTheFont free?
WhatTheFont is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is Playing Field free?
Playing Field is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Do WhatTheFont or Playing Field have ads?
Neither WhatTheFont nor Playing Field shows ads.

Other comparisons