Flame Services Browser vs ExPrimary
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
Flame Services Browser
Discover and interact with services on your local wireless network. This utility lists available Bonjour (ZeroConf) services, displays their details, and allows you to launch compatible applications directly from the service listing.
- Discover Bonjour/ZeroConf services
- Browse services by server
- View detailed service information
- Copy service details
- Launch compatible applications
Read full descriptionHide full description
Flame is a browser for Bonjour (also known as ZeroConf) network services. It lists the services advertised on your wireless network and you can browse them by server. When selecting a service, its advertised details are displayed. You can copy any of the service details by long-pressing a row. If an application on your iPhone or iPod touch can handle any of the advertised services, a command to open it right away is provided.
ExPrimary
This utility app enables control of a specific instrument, allowing users to select it from a group, collect data, and save it as a CSV file to a chosen network location. It integrates with a background of multiple instruments for comprehensive data management.
- Instrument selection
- Data collection
- CSV file saving
- Network location saving
- Email data export
Read full descriptionHide full description
cuvSpec 9CH Beta system plug-in to the ExPrimary App allows the user to control a cuvSpec 9CH Beta instrument. Key features are described in the user manual, which is available with instrument purchase. Basic features allow the user to engage a particular instrument in a background of multiple instruments, collect data, and save data as a CSV file to a network location of choice (including email).
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is ratings volume: Flame Services Browser at 16 against ExPrimary's 1. ExPrimary's advantage is iOS requirement (14.0 vs 26.1). On price, rating, ads and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
On the App Store both sit at effectively the same score — 4.9 for Flame Services Browser against 5.0 for ExPrimary. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: Flame Services Browser has 16 ratings behind it against 1, so its average is the more settled of the two.
| Parameter | Flame Services Browser | ExPrimary |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | 4.9 (16 ratings) | 5.0 (1 ratings) — better |
| Positive reviews | 76.9% of reviews | — |
| Number of ratings | 16 — better | 1 |
| Update frequency | Every 6 months | — |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Monetization | Free | Free |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad, Mac | iPhone, iPad, iPod |
| Requires iOS | 26.1 | 14.0 — better |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 7 MB | 17 MB |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | Thomas Insam | ExPrimary Inc. |
Customer experience
Flame Services Browser
ExPrimary
In-app purchases
Flame Services Browser
No in-app purchases
ExPrimary
No in-app purchases
Questions
Is Flame Services Browser free?
Is ExPrimary free?
Which has better reviews, Flame Services Browser or ExPrimary?
Do Flame Services Browser or ExPrimary have ads?
Other comparisons
