Comparison

Preop Eval vs ASCCP Management Guidelines

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Preop Eval

This app provides guidance for evaluating and preparing adult patients for non-cardiac surgery. It includes algorithms and resources on medication management, cardiac event timing, and preoperative testing, serving as both a reference and a teaching tool for medical professionals.

Highlights
  • Cardiac evaluation algorithm
  • Medication guidance (starting/stopping)
  • Surgery timing after cardiac events
  • Preoperative testing recommendations
  • Review for students and residents
  • Perioperative insulin management
Features
Read full description

Preop Eval organizes and presents much of the guidance that one needs in order to evaluate and prepare adult patients for non-cardiac surgery. It is based upon the guidelines on this topic from the American College of Cardiology, the European Society of Anaesthesiology, the American Society of Anesthesiologists, the Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement, the American College of Chest Physicians, and more (full references in the app). The app contains 1 algorithm and 3 resources: the cardiac evaluation algorithm, guidance on starting and stopping key medications in the perioperative period, guidance on timing of surgery after cardiac events, and guidance on preoperative testing. It also contains a review of preoperative evaluation mainly for students and residents. The app addresses such common questions as: - who needs bloodwork before surgery? - who needs an EKG or a CXR? - how do I handle patients on warfarin, clopidogrel, and DOAC's? - which patients need adjustment of perioperative insulin and diabetic meds, and how? - which active cardiac conditions preclude surgery? - how long after MI or stent should a patient wait before surgery? - are there adjustments to make on psych meds, rheumatologic meds, ACE's and ARB's? This app is written and intended for practicing physicians like internists, family physicians, and hospitalists; for resident physician trainees; and for medical students. In addition to being a reference, the algorithm is written to be a teaching tool by not just delivering an answer, but instead walking a physician through the evaluation process so that one learns that process along the way. As an educator and clinician, I am interested in feedback and I would be grateful for guidance on improving the tool.

About

ASCCP Management Guidelines

Access evidence-based recommendations for managing abnormal cervical cancer screening results and precursors. This app helps healthcare professionals navigate consensus guidelines for post-colposcopy and post-treatment scenarios, offering precise risk estimation and tailored interventions.

Highlights
  • Risk-based management guidelines
  • Abnormal screening result management
  • Post-colposcopy management
  • Post-treatment management
  • Risk estimation
  • Evidence-based recommendations
Features
Read full description

The ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations for managing abnormal cervical cancer screening results and cancer precursors, including post-colposcopy and post-treatment scenarios. ASCCP is pleased to offer this app to streamline navigation of the ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines for abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors. The guidelines articles, as published in the Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, as well as the comprehensive risk estimates, can be accessed through https://www.asccp.org/guidelines. These evidence-based management guidelines, initially developed in 2019, came together through a consensus process of 19 organizations. The updated management guidelines aim to: • Allow for a more complete and precise estimation of risk • Provide more appropriate intervention for high-risk individuals (detect and treat more precancer) • Recommend less intervention for low-risk individuals (decrease testing and treatment that won’t prevent cancer and may cause reproductive harm) • Allow for the future addition of new risk modifiers and screening and management technologies See https://www.asccp.org/UserGuide for tips on using the app.

Screenshots

Preop Eval4 screens
ASCCP Management Guidelines4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is price: Preop Eval at Free against ASCCP Management Guidelines's $14.99. Preop Eval also leads on review sentiment (67% vs 33%) and rating (5.0 vs 4.8). ASCCP Management Guidelines's advantage is ratings volume (8.6K vs 2) and chart position (#7 vs unranked). On update cadence, ads, in-app purchases and monetization model there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Preop Eval is free to download; ASCCP Management Guidelines costs $14.99 up front. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

Preop Eval holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 4.8. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: ASCCP Management Guidelines has 8.6K ratings behind it against 2, so its average is the more settled of the two. Written reviews point the same way: 67% of Preop Eval's written reviews are positive against 33% of ASCCP Management Guidelines's.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

Preop Eval ships an update every 6 months, ASCCP Management Guidelines every 3 months. The most recent releases landed on September 30, 2026 and October 16, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard7 real differences · 4 level
Preop Eval versus ASCCP Management Guidelines: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterPreop EvalASCCP Management Guidelines
PriceFree — better$14.99
Rating5.0 (2 ratings) — better4.8 (8.6K ratings)
Positive reviews66.7% of reviews — better33.0% of reviews
Number of ratings28.6K — better
Update frequencyEvery 6 monthsEvery 3 months — better
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
Best chart rank—#7 — better
DevicesiPhoneiPhone, iPad, iPod — better
Requires iOS16.611.2 — better
Further details — not scored
Size15 MB47 MB
Age rating17+17+
DeveloperUnited Health Services, Inc.American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology Inc

Customer experience

Preop Eval

All ratings2 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%
Written reviews12 reviews
Positive66.7%
Neutral8.3%
Negative25.0%

ASCCP Management Guidelines

All ratings8,595 ratings
Positive94.4%
Neutral2.0%
Negative3.6%
Written reviews94 reviews
Positive33.0%
Neutral12.8%
Negative54.3%

Bugs and requests

Preop Eval

Not enough reviews yet to summarise bugs or requests.

ASCCP Management Guidelines

Reported bugs

3 issues
  • Crashes after entering data
  • Missing options for certain clinical scenarios
  • Inconsistent recommendations compared to previous version

Requested features

4 requests
  • Better search functionality
  • Streamlined workflow
  • Improved algorithm visualization
  • Automatic updates for previous app users

In-app purchases

None

Preop Eval

No in-app purchases

None

ASCCP Management Guidelines

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is Preop Eval free?
Preop Eval is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is ASCCP Management Guidelines free?
ASCCP Management Guidelines costs $14.99, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, Preop Eval or ASCCP Management Guidelines?
Preop Eval is rated higher. Preop Eval averages 5.0 out of 5 from 2 ratings, while ASCCP Management Guidelines averages 4.8 from 8.6K ratings.
Do Preop Eval or ASCCP Management Guidelines have ads?
Neither Preop Eval nor ASCCP Management Guidelines shows ads.
Which is updated more often, Preop Eval or ASCCP Management Guidelines?
Preop Eval ships an update every 6 months, and ASCCP Management Guidelines every 3 months. Most recently, Preop Eval was updated on September 30, 2026 and ASCCP Management Guidelines on October 16, 2026.

Other comparisons