Mi vs Mobile Authenticator ES.
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
Mi
This app generates One-Time Passwords (OTPs) for secure access. It allows for rapid, secure, and cost-effective deployment of soft-tokens to users, ensuring automatic use of corrected time for OTP generation.
- Soft-token deployment
- One-Time Password (OTP) generation
- Automatic time correction for OTPs
- Secure and cost-effective token management
- Customizable preview mode
Read full descriptionHide full description
The Mi-Token Soft-Token application provides customers with the capability of deploying soft-tokens to a multitude of users rapidly, securely and cost-effectively. The application provides a preview of its functionality and styling when not loaded with data, and produces a useful OTP (One-Time Password) when loaded. The application allows for automatic use of corrected time when generating OTPs.
Mobile Authenticator ES.
This app provides two-factor authentication for enterprise security, enabling users to securely connect to company applications and networks from their mobile devices. It's designed for businesses requiring robust access control and is activated via enterprise security codes.
- Two-factor authentication
- Enterprise security
- Secure network access
- Mobile connectivity
- Activation via enterprise codes
Read full descriptionHide full description
Two-Factor authentication provided by OneSpan is now in your pocket! Mobile Authenticator Enterprise Security. This version can only be activated with Enterprise Security activation codes. Two-Factor authentication provided by OneSpan is now in your pocket! Mobile Authenticator Enterprise Security allows online users to safely connect to your enterprise application or networks from your mobile equipment. Help on using this application is available on OneSpan website via the Mobile Authenticator Enterprise Security application.
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is review sentiment: Mi at 78% against Mobile Authenticator ES.'s 24%. Mi also leads on rating (3.7 vs 2.5). Mobile Authenticator ES.'s advantage is ratings volume (60 vs 3) and update cadence (every 2 months vs every 5 months). On price, ads, in-app purchases and monetization model there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
Mi holds the better App Store score, 3.7 against 2.5. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: Mobile Authenticator ES. has 60 ratings behind it against 3, so its average is the more settled of the two. Written reviews point the same way: 78% of Mi's written reviews are positive against 24% of Mobile Authenticator ES.'s.
Mi ships an update every 5 months, Mobile Authenticator ES. every 2 months. The most recent releases landed on June 5, 2026 and June 10, 2026 respectively.
| Parameter | Mi | Mobile Authenticator ES. |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | 3.7 (3 ratings) — better | 2.5 (60 ratings) |
| Positive reviews | 77.8% of reviews — better | 24.5% of reviews |
| Number of ratings | 3 | 60 — better |
| Update frequency | Every 5 months | Every 2 months — better |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Monetization | Free | Free |
| Devices | iPhone | iPhone, iPad, iPod — better |
| Requires iOS | 18.0 | 16.0 — better |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 2 MB | 23 MB |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | Mi-Token Inc. | OneSpan International GmbH |
Customer experience
Mi
Mobile Authenticator ES.
In-app purchases
Mi
No in-app purchases
Mobile Authenticator ES.
No in-app purchases
