Comparison

Flight Weather vs CieloTracker

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Flight Weather

This app provides pilots with essential aviation weather data, including current observations and forecasts. It features a map-based interface for quick access and a search function for airports using FAA or ICAO codes. View weather in coded or translated formats with clear visual indicators for forecast availability.

Highlights
  • Maps-based weather interface
  • Airport search by FAA/ICAO codes
  • METAR and TAF display (coded/translated)
  • Forecast and observation station indicators
  • Customizable units for weather data
Features
Currently charting
Read full description

Flight Weather helps pilots find the weather information they need for a safe and efficient flight. Quickly locate and display current aviation weather observations and forecasts with an easy Maps-based interface, or use the search function to find airports by FAA or ICAO codes. Features: - tap a station to quickly show the current weather, tap again to display detailed information such as present weather and density altitude - display METARs (observations) and TAFs (forecasts) in their concise coded format, or view them in a helpful translated presentation - see at a glance which stations provide forecasts (purple pins) or observations only (green pins) - switch between your preferred units for temperature, wind speed, and altimeter setting

About

CieloTracker

Receive instant push alerts for critical aviation weather changes at your selected airports. This tool helps pilots and dispatchers monitor METARs and TAFs without constant manual checks, offering a clean, ad-free interface for efficient workflows.

Highlights
  • Real-time METAR/TAF push alerts
  • Custom minima thresholds
  • Unlimited airport monitoring
  • Alternate legality assessment
  • Ad-free interface
  • Background monitoring
Features
Read full description

CieloTracker is the professional aviation weather monitoring tool built for pilots and dispatchers who demand precision without the noise. Get real-time push alerts the moment METARs or TAFs at your selected airports drop below your custom minima thresholds. No more constant manual checks—focus on decisions, not data hunting. Key features: • Add and monitor unlimited airports with personalized minima settings • Instant notifications for deteriorating conditions • Quick alternate legality assessment and tracking • Clean, ad-free interface designed for efficient professional workflows • Continuous background monitoring of METARs and TAFs • Simple, powerful controls for busy ops environments Whether you’re single-pilot IFR, managing a fleet, or handling dispatch—stay ahead of changing weather with reliable, threshold-based intelligence. Important Safety Disclaimer: CieloTracker is a supplementary tool for situational awareness only. It is not certified for operational control, primary flight planning, or regulatory compliance. Always verify weather information with official FAA/NWS sources (e.g., Aviation Weather Center, Flight Service) before making any go/no-go decisions. Use at your own risk—cross-check all data independently. Download now and take back control of your weather monitoring.

Screenshots

Flight Weather3 screens
CieloTracker2 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is price: Flight Weather at $1.99 against CieloTracker's $99.99. Flight Weather also leads on ads (none vs shown) and chart position (#200 vs unranked). CieloTracker's advantage is rating (5.0 vs 3.0) and update cadence (daily vs every 16 months). On ratings volume, in-app purchases, monetization model and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Flight Weather costs $1.99 and CieloTracker $99.99 up front. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

CieloTracker holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 3.0. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 2 and 1 respectively.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

Flight Weather ships an update every 16 months, CieloTracker daily. The most recent releases landed on November 6, 2026 and October 30, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard6 real differences · 5 level
Flight Weather versus CieloTracker: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterFlight WeatherCieloTracker
Price$1.99 — better$99.99
Rating3.0 (2 ratings)5.0 (1 ratings) — better
Positive reviews66.7% of reviews—
Number of ratings2 — better1
Update frequencyEvery 16 monthsDaily — better
AdsNo — betterYes
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationPaidPaid
Best chart rank#200 — better—
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPod — betteriPhone, iPad
Requires iOS10.0 — better18.0
Further details — not scored
Size2 MB12 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperSpindrift SoftwareSamuel Gonzalez

Customer experience

Flight Weather

All ratings2 ratings
Positive50.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative50.0%
Written reviews3 reviews
Positive66.7%
Neutral0.0%
Negative33.3%

CieloTracker

All ratings1 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

None

Flight Weather

No in-app purchases

None

CieloTracker

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is Flight Weather free?
Flight Weather costs $1.99, with no in-app purchases.
Is CieloTracker free?
CieloTracker costs $99.99, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, Flight Weather or CieloTracker?
CieloTracker is rated higher. Flight Weather averages 3.0 out of 5 from 2 ratings, while CieloTracker averages 5.0 from 1 ratings.
Do Flight Weather or CieloTracker have ads?
CieloTracker shows ads; Flight Weather does not.
Which is updated more often, Flight Weather or CieloTracker?
Flight Weather ships an update every 16 months, and CieloTracker daily. Most recently, Flight Weather was updated on November 6, 2026 and CieloTracker on October 30, 2026.

Other comparisons