Comparison

宽立象棋 vs 围棋大师

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both games, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

宽立象棋

Features
Read full description

增加象棋游戏大厅功能; 增加棋子的提示; 本地可以选择段位,每局可以悔棋一次 这个是一款业余棋手段位评测软件,通过九个段位后,相当于专业二段的选手水平,可以试试看自己的水平到底是多少。 棋弈之道,贵在专注. 界面上非常简朴, 只有下棋这个功能,各位可以专心对弈,早日升级段位. 本程序是为了测试您的当前水平而推出,目前不支持以下功能: 1) 悔棋 2) 选择段位 我们在考虑增加测试模式,在不改变段位的情况下支持以上所有功能

About

围棋大师

This app offers a digital platform for playing the ancient strategy board game. Engage in single-player challenges against AI or compete with friends on the same device. It meticulously records every move made during gameplay.

Highlights
  • Single-player AI mode
  • Two-player local mode
  • Real-time move recording
  • Learn Go strategy
  • Simple interface
Features
Read full description

说明: 围棋是一种策略性两人棋类游戏,属琴棋书画四艺之一。围棋使用方形格状棋盘及黑白二色圆形棋子 进行对弈,棋盘上有纵横各19条直线将棋盘分成361个交叉点,棋子走在交叉点上,双方交替行棋,落子 后不能移动,以围地多者为胜。中国古代围棋是黑白双方在对角星位处各摆放两子(对角星布局),由 白棋先行。现代围棋由日本发展而来,取消了座子规则,黑先白后,使围棋的变化更加复杂多变。围棋 也被认为是世界上最复杂的棋盘游戏。 环宇围棋界面精简,运行流程,是学习围棋、与朋友对弈的不二之选。 基本下法: 对局双方各执一色棋子,黑先白后,交替下子,每次只能下一子。 棋子下在棋盘上的交叉点上。 棋子落子后,不得向其他位置移动。 轮流下子是双方的权利,但允许任何一方放弃下子权。 特点: 1、单人游戏模式,挑战人工智能; 2、支持双人模式,可与朋友同机对弈; 3、实时记录每一步信息。

Screenshots

宽立象棋3 screens
围棋大师4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: 围棋大师 at 5.0 against 宽立象棋's 4.0. 围棋大师 also leads on in-app purchases (none vs 6) and ads (none vs shown). 宽立象棋's advantage is review sentiment (60% vs 33%) and ratings volume (100 vs 5). On price, update cadence and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. 宽立象棋 sells 6 one-off in-app purchases. 围棋大师 asks for nothing beyond the download.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

围棋大师 holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 4.0. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: 宽立象棋 has 100 ratings behind it against 5, so its average is the more settled of the two. Written reviews complicate that: 60% of 宽立象棋's written reviews are positive against 33% of 围棋大师's, so the app with the better star average is not the one people write more warmly about.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

宽立象棋 ships an update every 7 months, 围棋大师 every 6 months. The most recent releases landed on October 29, 2026 and October 6, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard6 real differences · 4 level
宽立象棋 versus 围棋大师: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parameter宽立象棋围棋大师
PriceFreeFree
Rating4.0 (100 ratings)5.0 (5 ratings) — better
Positive reviews60.2% of reviews — better33.3% of reviews
Number of ratings100 — better5
Update frequencyEvery 7 monthsEvery 6 months — better
AdsYesNo — better
In-app purchasesYesNo — better
Monetization—Free
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod
Requires iOS12.08.0 — better
Further details — not scored
Size35 MB32 MB
Age rating12+4+
DeveloperCronlyGames Inc.飞龙 冯

Customer experience

宽立象棋

All ratings96 ratings
Positive71.9%
Neutral16.7%
Negative11.5%
Written reviews128 reviews
Positive60.2%
Neutral10.9%
Negative28.9%

围棋大师

All ratings5 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%
Written reviews3 reviews
Positive33.3%
Neutral0.0%
Negative66.7%

In-app purchases

6 purchases

宽立象棋

One-time6
  • 100 分$0.99
  • 6000个 金币$0.99
  • 220分$1.99
Show 3 more
  • 13000个 金币$1.99
  • 600分$4.99
  • 35000个 金币$4.99
None

围棋大师

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is 宽立象棋 free?
宽立象棋 is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Is 围棋大师 free?
围棋大师 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, 宽立象棋 or 围棋大师?
围棋大师 is rated higher. 宽立象棋 averages 4.0 out of 5 from 100 ratings, while 围棋大师 averages 5.0 from 5 ratings.
Do 宽立象棋 or 围棋大师 have ads?
宽立象棋 shows ads; 围棋大师 does not.
Which is updated more often, 宽立象棋 or 围棋大师?
宽立象棋 ships an update every 7 months, and 围棋大师 every 6 months. Most recently, 宽立象棋 was updated on October 29, 2026 and 围棋大师 on October 6, 2026.

Other comparisons