Comparison

Wild at Heart vs BlueSpring

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Wild at Heart

Access daily spiritual content including readings, blogs, and podcasts. Deepen your connection with faith through guided prayers and resources.

Highlights
  • Daily readings
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Prayers
  • Spiritual resources
Read full description

Connect with the world of Wild at Heart through daily readings, blogs, podcasts, prayers, and more. For more information about Wild at Heart, please visit: https://www.wildatheart.org.

About

BlueSpring

Manage and control exterior devices like lights, pumps, and sprinklers remotely. Create custom schedules using sunrise/sunset times, static on/off times, or a combination for precise automation. The app offers location-based timing and automatic Daylight Savings Time adjustments.

Highlights
  • Remote device control
  • Customizable scheduling
  • Sunrise/sunset timing
  • Static on/off times
  • Geolocation features
  • Daylight Savings adjustments
Features
Read full description

Accensys products by BlueSpring Controls help facilitate the control of exterior security lights, pumps, fountains, sprinklers, grow lights, parking lot lights and signs by allowing uncomplicated management through our simple-to-use app. You can create, edit, and override schedules from anywhere in the world with the BlueSpring app. Schedules you create will operate the controlled loads with infallible precision using Sunrise-Sunset, Static On-Off times, or even a combination of both. Accensys products have built-in geolocation software that provides accurate location-based timed events and Daylight Savings Time adjustments. Our mobile app gives you an easy-to-use way to take control of your exterior energy usage.

Screenshots

Wild at Heart4 screens
BlueSpring4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is ratings volume: Wild at Heart at 144 against BlueSpring's 1. BlueSpring's advantage is review sentiment (100% vs 76%) and rating (5.0 vs 4.7). On price, ads, in-app purchases and monetization model there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

BlueSpring holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 4.7. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: Wild at Heart has 144 ratings behind it against 1, so its average is the more settled of the two. Written reviews point the same way: 76% of Wild at Heart's written reviews are positive against 100% of BlueSpring's.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

Wild at Heart ships an update every 2 months, BlueSpring every 3 weeks. The most recent releases landed on November 1, 2026 and November 4, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard4 real differences · 6 level
Wild at Heart versus BlueSpring: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterWild at HeartBlueSpring
PriceFreeFree
Rating4.7 (144 ratings)5.0 (1 ratings) — better
Positive reviews76.4% of reviews100.0% of reviews — better
Number of ratings144 — better1
Update frequencyEvery 2 monthsEvery 3 weeks — better
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPod, Apple TV — betteriPhone, iPad, iPod
Requires iOS13.4 — better14
Further details — not scored
Size48 MB57 MB
Age rating4+17+
DeveloperRansomed Heart MinistriesBLUESPRING CONTROLS, LLC

Customer experience

Wild at Heart

All ratings133 ratings
Positive90.2%
Neutral5.3%
Negative4.5%
Written reviews55 reviews
Positive76.4%
Neutral12.7%
Negative10.9%

BlueSpring

All ratings1 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%
Written reviews1 reviews
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

Bugs and requests

Wild at Heart

Reported bugs

11 issues
  • Listen & share tab crashes the app
  • App crashes when trying to play downloaded daily prayers
  • App closes immediately upon opening after update
  • App won't open past the cover page
  • App doesn't work on WiFi or Cellular
Show 6 more
  • App more often than not isn't working
  • App buggy and closes when tapping episode title
  • Apple TV version shows no content
  • Blank screen with only play triangle and home button
  • Can't read entire daily reading without following a link
  • App fails to open on WiFi or Cellular

Requested features

18 requests
  • Offline access for prayers and podcasts
  • Fix listen & share tab crash
  • Allow videos to continue playing in background
  • Video resumes where left off
  • More offline features
Show 13 more
  • Offline mode for prayers
  • Download select prayers and podcasts
  • Offline access
  • Faster network speed
  • Cache frequently used static pages
  • Access to inspirational video clips and music
  • Daily readings available
  • More recent daily readings
  • Updated blogs
  • Access to daily readings without links
  • Improved screen readability for daily readings
  • Home button not at the bottom
  • Content available in airplane mode

BlueSpring

Not enough reviews yet to summarise bugs or requests.

In-app purchases

None

Wild at Heart

No in-app purchases

None

BlueSpring

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is Wild at Heart free?
Wild at Heart is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is BlueSpring free?
BlueSpring is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, Wild at Heart or BlueSpring?
BlueSpring is rated higher. Wild at Heart averages 4.7 out of 5 from 144 ratings, while BlueSpring averages 5.0 from 1 ratings.
Do Wild at Heart or BlueSpring have ads?
Neither Wild at Heart nor BlueSpring shows ads.
Which is updated more often, Wild at Heart or BlueSpring?
Wild at Heart ships an update every 2 months, and BlueSpring every 3 weeks. Most recently, Wild at Heart was updated on November 1, 2026 and BlueSpring on November 4, 2026.

Other comparisons