Comparison

iFSC vs StraboField

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

iFSC

Control and program seismic recorders remotely. Monitor device health, including battery, GPS, and storage. Set up network connections and view data without interrupting acquisition.

Highlights
  • Edit and program acquisition parameters
  • State-of-Health monitoring
  • RAM and disk usage monitoring
  • GPS status monitoring
  • Battery voltage monitoring
  • Network setup and status checks
  • Data monitoring during acquisition
Read full description

iFSC (Field Setup Controller) is a Command/Control app for the REF TEK 130 DAS Seismic Recorder via the Serial Port.. iFSC is used to edit and program the acquisition parameters of the DAS. It also provides State-of-Health monitoring with an extensive set of Status commands. State-of-Health monitoring includes acquisition status, RAM and disk usage, GPS status, main and backup battery voltages, time, and temperature. Additional commands allow setting up network connections and checking network status. Data monitoring without stopping acquisition is also available. The Command/Control functionality of this app requires the iFSC cable or WiFi Serial Adapter which are available from the manufacturer of the REF TEK 130 DAS Seismic Recorder.

About

StraboField

This mobile application helps geologists record field observations, capture data like photos and sketches, and create geologic maps. It supports various geological subdisciplines and allows for offline use with data syncing capabilities.

Highlights
  • Record field data with photos, sketches, and notes
  • Collect georeferenced orientation and spatial data
  • Use custom or built-in basemaps offline
  • Create multi-scale observations with nested Spots
  • Organize and back up data locally or to StraboSpot.org
  • Fully functional offline for remote fieldwork
Features
Read full description

StraboField is a powerful, all-in-one mobile app designed to streamline your geological fieldwork. Record observations, capture photos and sketches, collect orientation data, create geologic maps and stratigraphic sections — all from a single, map-centered platform. Easily collect spatially referenced data using point, line, or polygon-based Spots. Work across multiple scales using nested Spots and high-resolution image basemaps. Designed by geologists, for geologists, StraboField supports workflows across subdisciplines including structural geology, sedimentology, petrology, volcanology, and geomorphology. ** Key Features: ** * Capture field data with photos, sketches, and notes * Collect georeferenced orientation and spatial data * Use custom or built-in basemaps offline * Create multi-scale observations with nested Spots * Organize and back up data locally or to StraboSpot.org * StraboField is fully functional offline, making it ideal for remote fieldwork. Once online, your data can be synced to the StraboSpot digital data system at StraboSpot.org — an open- source platform supported by the National Science Foundation.

Screenshots

iFSC3 screens
StraboField4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is review sentiment: iFSC at 100% against StraboField's 50%. iFSC also leads on iOS requirement (8.2 vs 15.6). StraboField's advantage is rating (4.5 vs 3.0) and update cadence (every 2 weeks vs every 5 months). On price, ads, in-app purchases and monetization model there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

StraboField holds the better App Store score, 4.5 against 3.0. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: StraboField has 19 ratings behind it against 1, so its average is the more settled of the two. Written reviews complicate that: 100% of iFSC's written reviews are positive against 50% of StraboField's, so the app with the better star average is not the one people write more warmly about.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

iFSC ships an update every 5 months, StraboField every 2 weeks. The most recent releases landed on June 10, 2026 and September 18, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard5 real differences · 5 level
iFSC versus StraboField: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameteriFSCStraboField
PriceFreeFree
Rating3.0 (1 ratings)4.5 (19 ratings) — better
Positive reviews100.0% of reviews — better50.0% of reviews
Number of ratings119 — better
Update frequencyEvery 5 monthsEvery 2 weeks — better
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhone, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod — better
Requires iOS8.2 — better15.6
Further details — not scored
Size2 MB87 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperXeos Technologies Inc.The University of Kansas

Customer experience

iFSC

All ratings1 ratings
Positive0.0%
Neutral100.0%
Negative0.0%
Written reviews1 reviews
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

StraboField

All ratings19 ratings
Positive89.5%
Neutral0.0%
Negative10.5%
Written reviews4 reviews
Positive50.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative50.0%

In-app purchases

None

iFSC

No in-app purchases

None

StraboField

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is iFSC free?
iFSC is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is StraboField free?
StraboField is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, iFSC or StraboField?
StraboField is rated higher. iFSC averages 3.0 out of 5 from 1 ratings, while StraboField averages 4.5 from 19 ratings.
Do iFSC or StraboField have ads?
Neither iFSC nor StraboField shows ads.
Which is updated more often, iFSC or StraboField?
iFSC ships an update every 5 months, and StraboField every 2 weeks. Most recently, iFSC was updated on June 10, 2026 and StraboField on September 18, 2026.

Other comparisons