Comparison

Graphing vs Hyperbolic Games

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Graphing

Explore graph theory by connecting points and lines. Rearrange elements to identify isomorphic graphs and solve visual puzzles. This educational tool allows for interactive creation and manipulation of custom graphs.

Highlights
  • Connect points with lines
  • Move points to rearrange graphs
  • Identify isomorphic graphs
  • Create custom graphs
  • Delete points
  • Add new points
Features
Read full description

A simple Graph Theory toy. Connect points on a graph together with other points. Move them around to find isomorphic graphs. Can you find a way to make none of the lines cross? With a custom graph, you can: ‣ Double-tap one of the colored points to delete it. ‣ Add a new point with the + button up top. ‣ Tap-and-hold on a point to select it, then tap any other point to add or remove a line between the two. ‣ Slide and glide the points around to find new ways to view your graph.

About

Hyperbolic Games

Explore mathematical concepts through interactive games on curved surfaces. This app illustrates hyperbolic geometry and topology, offering a unique educational experience for advanced students. Discover different models of the hyperbolic plane and their relationship to spheres.

Highlights
  • Interactive hyperbolic plane exploration
  • 2D and 3D multi-connected spaces
  • Beltrami-Klein and Poincaré disk models
  • Visualization of Klein quartic surface
  • Sudoku puzzles with high symmetry
Read full description

The Hyperbolic Games are similar in spirit to the Torus Games, but played on curved surfaces. Most people will want to start with the Torus Games instead, which offer a selection of easily playable games, designed for children ages 10 and up, all implemented in multi-connected spaces in 2 and 3 dimensions. The Hyperbolic Games, by contrast, are for math students — advanced undergraduates and beginning graduate students. These games are more challenging than the Torus Games because they combine a multi-connected topology with a non-Euclidean geometry. Mathematically they illustrate the following: - The hyperbolic plane, as a live scrollable object. - The under-appreciated fact that the two traditional models of the hyperbolic plane are simply different views of the same fixed-radius surface in Minkowski space: the Beltrami-Klein model corresponds to a viewpoint at the origin (central projection) while the Poincaré disk model corresponds to a viewpoint one radian further back (stereographic projection). Players may pinch-to-zoom to pass from one to the other, or stop to view the model from any other distance. - The strong — but also under-appreciated — correspondence between the hyperbolic plane and an ordinary sphere. In particular, central projection of the sphere corresponds to the Beltrami-Klein model of the hyperbolic plane, and stereographic projection of the sphere corresponds to the Poincaré disk model of the hyperbolic plane. - The Klein quartic surface, viewed with its natural geometry. The sudoku puzzles take full advantage of the Klein quartic’s tremendous amount of symmetry.

Screenshots

Graphing3 screens
Hyperbolic Games4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: Graphing at 5.0 against Hyperbolic Games's 4.6. Graphing also leads on review sentiment (80% vs 60%). Hyperbolic Games's advantage is ratings volume (10 vs 2). On price, update cadence, ads and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

Graphing holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 4.6. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: Hyperbolic Games has 10 ratings behind it against 2, so its average is the more settled of the two. Written reviews point the same way: 80% of Graphing's written reviews are positive against 60% of Hyperbolic Games's.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

Graphing ships an update every 5 months, Hyperbolic Games every 7 months. The most recent releases landed on June 5, 2026 and June 1, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard3 real differences · 7 level
Graphing versus Hyperbolic Games: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterGraphingHyperbolic Games
PriceFreeFree
Rating5.0 (2 ratings) — better4.6 (10 ratings)
Positive reviews80.0% of reviews — better60.0% of reviews
Number of ratings210 — better
Update frequencyEvery 5 months — betterEvery 7 months
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod
Requires iOS11.0 — better12.0
Further details — not scored
Size18 MB3 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperSteven BrunwasserJeff Weeks

Customer experience

Graphing

All ratings2 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%
Written reviews5 reviews
Positive80.0%
Neutral20.0%
Negative0.0%

Hyperbolic Games

All ratings10 ratings
Positive90.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative10.0%
Written reviews5 reviews
Positive60.0%
Neutral20.0%
Negative20.0%

In-app purchases

None

Graphing

No in-app purchases

None

Hyperbolic Games

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is Graphing free?
Graphing is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is Hyperbolic Games free?
Hyperbolic Games is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, Graphing or Hyperbolic Games?
Graphing is rated higher. Graphing averages 5.0 out of 5 from 2 ratings, while Hyperbolic Games averages 4.6 from 10 ratings.
Do Graphing or Hyperbolic Games have ads?
Neither Graphing nor Hyperbolic Games shows ads.
Which is updated more often, Graphing or Hyperbolic Games?
Graphing ships an update every 5 months, and Hyperbolic Games every 7 months. Most recently, Graphing was updated on June 5, 2026 and Hyperbolic Games on June 1, 2026.

Other comparisons