Comparison

易遊網 vs 遊走台灣

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

易遊網

Your all-in-one travel companion for booking flights, hotels, and tours. Discover exclusive app-only deals and manage all your travel plans in one place. Enjoy a seamless booking experience with flexible payment options and loyalty rewards.

Highlights
  • Book global flights and hotels
  • Discover domestic and international tours
  • Exclusive app-only discounts
  • Loyalty points for discounts
  • Flexible payment and cancellation options
  • Integrated travel management
Features
Read full description

全台最大旅遊 App,國內外旅遊商品一站購足! 搜機票、找飯店、訂行程、買票券、瘋露營、玩體驗… 所有旅遊需求,一機輕鬆搞定,再享 App 專屬優惠! ▼ 找機票
 .全球便宜機票,線上即時訂位、迅速付款 .可訂混艙、不同點進出航班,選擇更多、更自由 
 .串接世界最大航空訂位系統,便宜機票輕鬆搜、方便比價,訂閱「低價通知」即時透過推播提醒,幫助搶到心動價格的機票 .提供訂位查詢服務,已訂航班資訊可隨時查閱 .線上自動化改票服務,免人工作業迅速完成改票需求
 .全球航班機加酒輕鬆搭配、說走就走 .全球接送機全面上架 ▼ 找飯店 .國內外超過 500 萬種專案選擇,滿足各種住房需求 .星級飯店、商務旅館、設計旅店、特色民宿應有盡有 .訂房可延後付款、可在一定時間內免費取消
 .上萬則飯店評鑑,最真實的入住心得一覽無遺 
 .隨訂隨住!台灣訂房於當日完成訂購及付款,即可當天入住
 .支援即時定位服務,立即搜尋最近飯店,空房輕鬆找、搭配地圖不迷路
 
▼ 找旅遊
 .國內外團體旅遊、自由行、機加酒、體驗活動、票券Wi-Fi、豪華遊輪、護照簽證…一站購足 .國內外跟團旅遊囊括 50 大旅遊品牌商品,行程最齊全,一次輕鬆比較超方便 .高鐵假期、高鐵國旅聯票、環島之星、火車環島、巴士旅遊、離島假期、自駕玩樂、露營體驗等多樣國旅商品,激發旅遊靈感
.可指定旅遊天數、預算搜尋,更好找到你想要的 ▼ and More... .清新且直覺的視覺設計,給您流暢舒適的瀏覽體驗,玩轉世界更加得心應手 .於 App 消費可累積 eMoney 紅利點數,點數折抵消費無上限,讓你邊賺邊玩 .刷卡享 0 利率分期,支援 3 大行動支付,無卡付款也沒問題,輕鬆付款無負擔 .[我的訂單] 功能完整儲存訂單記錄,資訊隨身帶著走,客服對話、上傳補件一次搞定,隨時查詢超方便 .無論是機票、訂房、旅遊,加購高鐵票享優惠折扣 .生日折扣碼大禮包!

About

遊走台灣

Features
Read full description

台灣景點、美食、伴手禮等資料,分門別類,一目了然,操作容易。可按照區域或縣市來篩選,或立即找出目前位置附近的景點。每個地點均可透過遊記或照片來詳細了解。

Screenshots

易遊網4 screens
遊走台灣4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: 易遊網 at 4.8 against 遊走台灣's 4.0. 易遊網 also leads on ratings volume (953 vs 5) and update cadence (monthly vs every 2 months). 遊走台灣's advantage is ads (none vs shown) and iOS requirement (13.0 vs 15.0). On price, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

易遊網 holds the better App Store score, 4.8 against 4.0. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: 易遊網 has 953 ratings behind it against 5, so its average is the more settled of the two.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

易遊網 ships an update monthly, 遊走台灣 every 2 months. The most recent releases landed on October 23, 2026 and October 24, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard5 real differences · 5 level
易遊網 versus 遊走台灣: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parameter易遊網遊走台灣
PriceFreeFree
Rating4.8 (953 ratings) — better4.0 (5 ratings)
Positive reviews57.1% of reviews—
Number of ratings953 — better5
Update frequencyMonthly — betterEvery 2 months
AdsYesNo — better
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFree with in-app purchases—
DevicesiPhone, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod — better
Requires iOS15.013.0 — better
Further details — not scored
Size113 MB31 MB
Age rating4+17+
DeveloperezTravel Co., Ltd.HSIN-HUNG Chen

Customer experience

易遊網

All ratings953 ratings
Positive96.2%
Neutral2.0%
Negative1.8%
Written reviews7 reviews
Positive57.1%
Neutral14.3%
Negative28.6%

遊走台灣

All ratings5 ratings
Positive80.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative20.0%

In-app purchases

None

易遊網

No in-app purchases

None

遊走台灣

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is 易遊網 free?
易遊網 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is 遊走台灣 free?
遊走台灣 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, 易遊網 or 遊走台灣?
易遊網 is rated higher. 易遊網 averages 4.8 out of 5 from 953 ratings, while 遊走台灣 averages 4.0 from 5 ratings.
Do 易遊網 or 遊走台灣 have ads?
易遊網 shows ads; 遊走台灣 does not.
Which is updated more often, 易遊網 or 遊走台灣?
易遊網 ships an update monthly, and 遊走台灣 every 2 months. Most recently, 易遊網 was updated on October 23, 2026 and 遊走台灣 on October 24, 2026.

Other comparisons