Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy vs NoduleRisk
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side โ with what reviewers say about each.
Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy
This application assists medical professionals in selecting the correct fiberoptic scope for endotracheal tubes, double lumen tubes, or blockers. It quickly provides the maximum compatible scope size, allowing for efficient and accurate equipment selection in critical situations.
- Select ETT size
- Determine maximum fiberoptic scope
- Suggest smaller scope option
- Reduces uncertainty in emergent situations
- One-touch operation
- Fast results
Read full descriptionHide full description
Finally there is an app that tells you the appropriate fiberoptic scope for the endotracheal, double lumen tube or blocker that you want to use. Just select the ETT you want and the app will give you the maximum fiberoptic scope that will fit through. You can use that size or the next size smaller. This app takes all the uncertainty out of a possible emergent situation, and it does it with just one touch. Don't fumble around sticking the scope through all those tubes just to find the right one. Get your answer, fast!
NoduleRisk
Read full descriptionHide full description
NoduleRisk is a clinical decision support tool for physicians evaluating pulmonary nodule malignancy risk. It computes probability estimates and management guidance across five validated models simultaneously. MODELS INCLUDED โข Mayo Clinic (ACCP) โ logistic regression model for incidentally detected nodules โข Brock (BTS/PanCan) โ recommended for screening populations; validated in the Pan-Canadian Lung Cancer Screening Study โข Herder (BTS) โ incorporates FDG-PET/CT uptake when available โข BIMC (Bayesian) โ Bayesian likelihood ratio model with adjustable prior probability; displays individual likelihood ratio contributions โข Fleischner 2017 โ guideline-based follow-up recommendations with automatic risk stratification FEATURES โข Multi-nodule evaluation (up to 6 nodules per patient) โข Volume doubling time calculation from serial CT measurements โข Risk-stratified management recommendations for each model โข Applicability warnings when inputs are outside model validation ranges โข Clinical context adjustments for screening and biopsy-referred populations โข Fully offline โ no data is transmitted or stored IMPORTANT NoduleRisk is intended for use by qualified clinicians as a decision support aid only. Results must be interpreted in the context of the full clinical picture and do not substitute for institutional guidelines, multidisciplinary team discussion, or clinical judgment.
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is price: NoduleRisk at Free against Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy's $1.99. On ads, in-app purchases, device support and iOS requirement there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price ยท Rating ยท Positive reviews ยท Number of ratings ยท Update frequency ยท Ads ยท In-app purchases ยท Monetization ยท Best chart rank ยท Devices ยท Requires iOS
NoduleRisk is free to download; Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy costs $1.99 up front. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
| Parameter | Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy | NoduleRisk |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.99 | Free โ better |
| Positive reviews | 0.0% of reviews | โ |
| Update frequency | Every 13 months | โ |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Monetization | Paid | โ |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad โ better | iPhone |
| Requires iOS | 16.6 โ better | 17.6 |
| Further details โ not scored | ||
| Size | 26 MB | 2 MB |
| Age rating | 17+ | 17+ |
| Developer | Crystal Clear Solutions | Rutvik Shah |
In-app purchases
Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy
No in-app purchases
NoduleRisk
No in-app purchases
Questions
Is Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy free?
Is NoduleRisk free?
Do Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy or NoduleRisk have ads?
Other comparisons















