Comparison

快速聖經 vs Bible Reader

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

快速聖經

Experience an immersive Bible reading journey designed for tablets. Enjoy a large-screen layout, audio playback, annotation tools, and quick search functionality. This app aims to help users read the Bible deeply and consistently.

Highlights
  • Large-screen reading layout
  • Audio playback
  • Highlighting and annotation
  • Fast search
  • Adjustable font size
  • Copy and share verses
Features
Read full description

重新打造,全面進化,專為平板而生的沈浸式聖經閱讀體驗! • 大畫面閱讀設計,新舊約整合呈現,如同翻閱紙本聖經,一次看得更多、更清楚、更專注。 • 有聲閱讀功能,讓神的話語在任何時刻持續陪伴,不受時間與場景限制。 • 螢光筆標記與經文註解,完整保存每一次感動,讓信仰歷程清楚可回顧。 • 極速搜尋與關鍵字提示,想找的經文,立刻出現。 • 字體大小精細調整,完整發揮平板大畫面的優勢。 • 長按經文即可複製、分享、書籤與註解,所有功能一指完成。 • 若廣告影響閱讀,關閉裝置網路即可回歸純粹讀經體驗。 這不只是一本電子聖經,而是一款讓你真正「讀得久、讀得深、讀得下去」的平板聖經應用。

About

Bible Reader

Access and search various Bible translations in Chinese and English with lightning-fast speed. Features cross-references and an intuitive interface for easy navigation.

Highlights
  • Multiple Bible translations
  • Traditional/Simplified Chinese support
  • English language support
  • Cross-references
  • Fast built-in search engine
  • Ease of use
Features
Read full description

Traditional/Simplified Chinese/English Bible Reader (Faith Version) Cross References, Ease to Use, Built-in Fast Search Engine, Search speed is 10x to 1000x faster than iBook (e.g. searching "Jesus wept" could take 2 minutes 10 sec in iBook but it only takes 0.1 sec in Bible Reader.)

Screenshots

Bible Reader2 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: Bible Reader at 5.0 against 快速聖經's 4.4. Bible Reader also leads on ads (none vs shown) and monetization model (free vs ad-supported). On price, ratings volume, update cadence and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

Bible Reader holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 4.4. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 8 and 6 respectively.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

快速聖經 ships an update every 5 months, Bible Reader every 8 months. The most recent releases landed on September 25, 2026 and September 17, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard4 real differences · 6 level
快速聖經 versus Bible Reader: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parameter快速聖經Bible Reader
PriceFreeFree
Rating4.4 (8 ratings)5.0 (6 ratings) — better
Positive reviews95.2% of reviews—
Number of ratings8 — better6
Update frequencyEvery 5 months — betterEvery 8 months
AdsYesNo — better
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationAd-supportedFree — better
DevicesiPadiPhone, iPad, iPod — better
Requires iOS15.0 — better15.6
Further details — not scored
Size12 MB104 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperYu-Sheng Wongfojc.net

Customer experience

快速聖經

All ratings8 ratings
Positive87.5%
Neutral12.5%
Negative0.0%
Written reviews21 reviews
Positive95.2%
Neutral4.8%
Negative0.0%

Bible Reader

All ratings6 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

None

快速聖經

No in-app purchases

None

Bible Reader

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is 快速聖經 free?
快速聖經 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is Bible Reader free?
Bible Reader is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, 快速聖經 or Bible Reader?
Bible Reader is rated higher. 快速聖經 averages 4.4 out of 5 from 8 ratings, while Bible Reader averages 5.0 from 6 ratings.
Do 快速聖經 or Bible Reader have ads?
快速聖經 shows ads; Bible Reader does not.
Which is updated more often, 快速聖經 or Bible Reader?
快速聖經 ships an update every 5 months, and Bible Reader every 8 months. Most recently, 快速聖經 was updated on September 25, 2026 and Bible Reader on September 17, 2026.

Other comparisons