Comparison

BAFWorks vs Quality Welding Time Tracker

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

BAFWorks

Control Powerfoil X internet protocol fans directly. Adjust settings like lock passwords and IP addresses. Features global start, stop, and lock options for all connected fans.

Highlights
  • Direct fan control
  • Password management
  • IP address configuration
  • Global fan operations
  • Lock fan feature
Features
Read full description

PLEASE NOTE: This is app is used to control the Powerfoil X line of internet protocol fans directly; not through the web interface. You must have a Powerfoil X fan configured to use this app. The default lock password is 1271. To change the lock password or the ip address use the settings button in the upper right hand corner. There are also global start all, stop all and lock all fan options at the bottom of the app.

About

Quality Welding Time Tracker

This app helps mobile users track their time spent on welding and fabrication tasks. It provides a simple interface for logging work hours for professional or personal projects.

Highlights
  • Time tracking for welding
  • Time tracking for fabrication
  • Mobile device support
  • Simple logging interface
Features
Read full description

Time tracking for Quality Welding and Fab for mobile devices.

Screenshots

Quality Welding Time Tracker3 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: BAFWorks at 5.0 against Quality Welding Time Tracker's 1.0. BAFWorks also leads on iOS requirement (6.0 vs 13.0). Quality Welding Time Tracker's advantage is device support (3 vs 1). On price, ratings volume, update cadence and ads there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

BAFWorks holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 1.0. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 1 and 1 respectively.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

BAFWorks ships an update every 4 months, Quality Welding Time Tracker every 2 months. The most recent releases landed on July 6, 2026 and July 10, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard3 real differences · 6 level
BAFWorks versus Quality Welding Time Tracker: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterBAFWorksQuality Welding Time Tracker
PriceFreeFree
Rating5.0 (1 ratings) — better1.0 (1 ratings)
Number of ratings11
Update frequencyEvery 4 monthsEvery 2 months — better
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPadiPhone, iPad, iPod — better
Requires iOS6.0 — better13.0
Further details — not scored
Size35 MB22 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperDelta T LLCPixis Consulting LLC

Customer experience

BAFWorks

All ratings1 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

Quality Welding Time Tracker

All ratings1 ratings
Positive0.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative100.0%

In-app purchases

None

BAFWorks

No in-app purchases

None

Quality Welding Time Tracker

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is BAFWorks free?
BAFWorks is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is Quality Welding Time Tracker free?
Quality Welding Time Tracker is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, BAFWorks or Quality Welding Time Tracker?
BAFWorks is rated higher. BAFWorks averages 5.0 out of 5 from 1 ratings, while Quality Welding Time Tracker averages 1.0 from 1 ratings.
Do BAFWorks or Quality Welding Time Tracker have ads?
Neither BAFWorks nor Quality Welding Time Tracker shows ads.
Which is updated more often, BAFWorks or Quality Welding Time Tracker?
BAFWorks ships an update every 4 months, and Quality Welding Time Tracker every 2 months. Most recently, BAFWorks was updated on July 6, 2026 and Quality Welding Time Tracker on July 10, 2026.

Other comparisons