Comparison

MagicInfo vs Bitlog WMS 8.1

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

MagicInfo

Manage and publish content for large format displays directly from your smartphone. Monitor device status, approve new devices, and configure server settings remotely. Requires connection to the MagicInfo Premium Edition Server.

Highlights
  • Monitor LFD device status
  • Approve and register new devices
  • View server notices
  • Configure system settings
  • Remote device management
Read full description

MagicInfo Mobile application is mobile version of MagicInfo-i Premium Edition Server, which is a web-based management tool that manages content and devices and organizes and publishes content for LFD(Large Format Display). By installing the MagicInfo Mobile application on your smartphone, you can access the server through the smartphone to manage devices and configure the server settings. Features - Monitoring : you can view the LFD device status and change settings. (Display Information, Schedule Information, System Information, Time Information, Remote Job Information) - Approval : the LFD devices that are not registered on the server will appear and you can register devices on the server. - Notice : you can view all the notices registered on the server. - Setting : you can view and change the system settings for MagicInfo Mobile. How to use - Network Environment : To access a server using a smartphone, ensure the server and smartphone are on the same network. - Server Setting to connect : To run the application for the first time after installation, ensure you enter the server IP and port you want to access. - Log in : To log in, ensure your ID and password should exist in MagicInfo Premium Edition Server.

About

Bitlog WMS 8.1

Features
Read full description

Bitlog WMS offers powerful standard functionality that is suitable for all operators active in warehousing and distribution. A single modern system can be configured for different activities, as well as for companies of various sizes.

Screenshots

MagicInfo2 screens
Bitlog WMS 8.14 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is update cadence: Bitlog WMS 8.1 at every 3 weeks against MagicInfo's every 11 months. MagicInfo's advantage is iOS requirement (6.0 vs 14.0). On price, ads, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

MagicInfo ships an update every 11 months, Bitlog WMS 8.1 every 3 weeks. The most recent releases landed on October 17, 2026 and October 18, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard2 real differences · 8 level
MagicInfo versus Bitlog WMS 8.1: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterMagicInfoBitlog WMS 8.1
PriceFreeFree
Rating1.0 (1 ratings) — better—
Positive reviews40.0% of reviews—
Number of ratings1 — better—
Update frequencyEvery 11 monthsEvery 3 weeks — better
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFree—
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod
Requires iOS6.0 — better14.0
Further details — not scored
Size23 MB52 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperSamsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Bitlog AB

In-app purchases

None

MagicInfo

No in-app purchases

None

Bitlog WMS 8.1

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is MagicInfo free?
MagicInfo is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is Bitlog WMS 8.1 free?
Bitlog WMS 8.1 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Do MagicInfo or Bitlog WMS 8.1 have ads?
Neither MagicInfo nor Bitlog WMS 8.1 shows ads.
Which is updated more often, MagicInfo or Bitlog WMS 8.1?
MagicInfo ships an update every 11 months, and Bitlog WMS 8.1 every 3 weeks. Most recently, MagicInfo was updated on October 17, 2026 and Bitlog WMS 8.1 on October 18, 2026.

Other comparisons