Comparison

Jupiter ACE vs PockEmul

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Jupiter ACE

Explore the history of computing by learning the Forth programming language on a simulated 1982 home computer. This educational tool provides an authentic experience for aspiring programmers interested in retro technology.

Highlights
  • Forth programming language simulation
  • 1982 home computer emulation
  • Educational retro computing experience
  • Freely available source code
  • iPad compatible
Features
Read full description

Go back in time and learn to program Forth with this Jupiter ACE on your iPad. The Jupiter ACE was a home computer released back in 1982. While all other home computers at the time used BASIC as the built in programming language, the Jupiter ACE used Forth. This emulator is built with freely available documents and source code. Project files are available on github. Jupiter ACE is trademark of Andrews UK Ltd.

About

PockEmul

This app emulates vintage pocket computers and scientific calculators from the late 70s and 80s. It offers a wide range of fully emulated models, adapting to different screen sizes for use on iPhones and iPads. Access all functionalities and models with a single subscription fee.

Highlights
  • Emulates vintage pocket computers
  • Emulates scientific calculators
  • Supports iPhone and iPad
  • Wide range of emulated models
  • Adaptive screen size behavior
  • Subscription for full access
Read full description

PockEmul is an emulator of vintage pocket computers and scientific calculators from late 70s' to end 80s'. It adapts its behavior depending on the screen size. it is usable both on iPhone and iPad. PockEmul comes with 8 models fully emulated: - The scientific calculator HP-35, HP41C (HP41CX model), HP-48GX, FX 8000G, TI 57. - The pocket computer Sharp PC 1245, Sharp PC 1350, Sharp PC 1500 and Tandy PC-2. A single subscription fee give access to all functionalities and emulated models. Current available models are : - Casio PB-100, PB-300 - Casio PB-1000, PB-1000C - Casio PB-2000C, AI-1000 - Casio VX-3, VX-4, FX-870p - Casio FX-890p, Z-1, Z-1GR - Casio FP-200, FP-200Jap - Casio FX-9000p - Sharp PC-1211 Simulator - Sharp PC 1250, PC 1251, PC 1251H, PC 1255 - Sharp PC 1260, PC 1261, PC 1262 - Sharp PC-1280, PC-1280Jap - Sharp PC 1360, PC 2500 - Sharp PC 1401, PC 1402, PC 1403, PC 1403H, PC 1421, PC 1445 - Sharp PC-1425, PC-1425Jap, PC-1450, PC-1450Jap, PC-1475, PC-1475Jap - Sharp PC 1500, PC 1500jap, PC 1500A, PC 1501,CE 150 - Sharp PC 1600, CE 1600p - Sharp PC-E500, PC-E500jap, PC-E500-BL, PC-E550, PC-E500S, PC-U6000, PC-E220, PC-G850V - Sharp Printer CE-126P - HP 41C Printer (non-HP-IL) 82143A - HP 71b - HP-335, HP-10c, HP 11c, HP 12c, HP 15c and HP 16c which are RPN calculators. - TI-74, TI-95, CC-40, TI-42, TI-55 and TI-58 calculators. PC-100 Printer - Nec PC-2001, General LBC-1100, Sanco TPC-8300, National JR-800, Canon X-07, Epson HX-20 - Elektronika MK-85 , MK-85M , MK-90 - Panasonic HHC Terms of Use: https://www.apple.com/legal/internet-services/itunes/dev/stdeula/

Screenshots

Jupiter ACE3 screens
PockEmul4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is in-app purchases: Jupiter ACE at none against PockEmul's 4. PockEmul's advantage is update cadence (monthly vs every 63 months) and rating (4.2 vs 4.0). On price, ratings volume, ads and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. PockEmul sells 4 in-app purchases, starting at $1.49 per month. Jupiter ACE asks for nothing beyond the download.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

PockEmul holds the better App Store score, 4.2 against 4.0. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 8 and 15 respectively. Written reviews point the same way: 67% of Jupiter ACE's written reviews are positive against 77% of PockEmul's.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

Jupiter ACE ships an update every 63 months, PockEmul monthly. Both last shipped on October 24, 2026.

Scorecard5 real differences · 5 level
Jupiter ACE versus PockEmul: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterJupiter ACEPockEmul
PriceFreeFree
Rating4.0 (8 ratings)4.2 (15 ratings) — better
Positive reviews66.7% of reviews76.9% of reviews — better
Number of ratings815 — better
Update frequencyEvery 63 monthsMonthly — better
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNo — betterYes
MonetizationFree — betterSubscription
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod
Requires iOS15.0 — better15.6
Further details — not scored
Size35 MB104 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperMemention Holding ABMyrio Conseils

Customer experience

Jupiter ACE

All ratings8 ratings
Positive75.0%
Neutral12.5%
Negative12.5%
Written reviews9 reviews
Positive66.7%
Neutral11.1%
Negative22.2%

PockEmul

All ratings11 ratings
Positive81.8%
Neutral9.1%
Negative9.1%
Written reviews13 reviews
Positive76.9%
Neutral7.7%
Negative15.4%

In-app purchases

None

Jupiter ACE

No in-app purchases

4 purchases

PockEmul

Subscriptions4
  • Monthly Subscription3 Days trial$1.491 Month
  • Monthly Subscription$2.991 Month
  • Monthly Subs. First year offer1 Year trial$2.991 Month
Show 1 more
  • Yearly Subscription1 Year trial$23.991 Year

Questions

Is Jupiter ACE free?
Jupiter ACE is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is PockEmul free?
PockEmul is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Which has better reviews, Jupiter ACE or PockEmul?
PockEmul is rated higher. Jupiter ACE averages 4.0 out of 5 from 8 ratings, while PockEmul averages 4.2 from 15 ratings.
Do Jupiter ACE or PockEmul have ads?
Neither Jupiter ACE nor PockEmul shows ads.
Which is updated more often, Jupiter ACE or PockEmul?
Jupiter ACE ships an update every 63 months, and PockEmul monthly. Most recently, Jupiter ACE was updated on October 24, 2026 and PockEmul on October 24, 2026.

Other comparisons