PAC vs Squash RX
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
PAC
Read full descriptionHide full description
Official app of the 2025 Joint Meeting of the Plains Anthropological & Midwest Archaeological Conferences in Iowa City, Iowa.
Squash RX
Read full descriptionHide full description
Managing whitefly-transmitted virus complex (WTVC) in squash is difficult, as no single tactic consistently reduces disease severity. Over three years of field studies in southern Georgia, we tested five cultural practices and pest management tactics to see which ones help reduce disease. Using advanced analysis, we created a risk assessment tool that highlights which practices matter most. This app was designed to help growers determine and avoid high-risk situations in their fields.
Screenshots
Verdict
PAC and Squash RX are too close to call on the numbers: across 5 compared parameters — price, ads, in-app purchases and device support among them — neither pulls far enough ahead to decide it. What separates them is feature set and interface, not measurable difference.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
| Parameter | PAC | Squash RX |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Update frequency | Every 12 months | — |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad, iPod | iPhone, iPad, iPod |
| Requires iOS | 15.6 | 14.0 — better |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 25 MB | 92 MB |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | Chad Caswell | Charles T. Bargeron |
In-app purchases
PAC
No in-app purchases
Squash RX
No in-app purchases
