Comparison

悬浮时钟&悬浮时间&连点器 vs Auto Click

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

悬浮时钟&悬浮时间&连点器

Read full description

悬浮时钟可以启动悬浮窗,让时间悬浮在任意的APP上,是你抢茅台抢鞋子抢手办…的专业帮手,人手必备。 特色功能: 1.毫秒显示:可校准时间,毫秒级显示,秒杀更快更准! 2.网速检测:实时测速,随时掌握精准的网络速度。 3.连点器:自动点击,快速响应,让你解放双手的同时又快人一步。

About

Auto Click

Features
Read full description

Record web actions on your iPhone or iPad—tap, long press, type, scroll, wait, and refresh—then loop the whole sequence automatically. Built-in browser, visual step editor, run logs, English & Chinese UI. Use it for repetitive web workflows, demos, and personal productivity on sites you are allowed to automate. You control every step.

Screenshots

悬浮时钟&悬浮时间&连点器1 screens
Auto Click3 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is in-app purchases: Auto Click at none against 悬浮时钟&悬浮时间&连点器's 1. 悬浮时钟&悬浮时间&连点器's advantage is iOS requirement (11.0 vs 16.6). On price and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. 悬浮时钟&悬浮时间&连点器 sells 1 one-off in-app purchase. Auto Click asks for nothing beyond the download.

Scorecard2 real differences · 4 level
悬浮时钟&悬浮时间&连点器 versus Auto Click: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parameter悬浮时钟&悬浮时间&连点器Auto Click
PriceFreeFree
Update frequency—Every 2 weeks
Ads—No
In-app purchasesYesNo — better
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPod — betteriPhone, iPad
Requires iOS11.0 — better16.6
Further details — not scored
Size8 MB4 MB
Age rating17+17+
Developer伟鑫 许宝莹 井

In-app purchases

1 purchases

悬浮时钟&悬浮时间&连点器

One-time1
  • 永久解锁$5.99
None

Auto Click

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is 悬浮时钟&悬浮时间&连点器 free?
悬浮时钟&悬浮时间&连点器 is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Is Auto Click free?
Auto Click is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

Other comparisons