Comparison

颜节气 vs 年号干支表

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

颜节气

Track the countdown to the next solar term with this app. It provides traditional Chinese colors and brief explanations for each term, along with convenient countdown widgets. It also supports tracking the hottest days of summer and the coldest days of winter.

Highlights
  • Solar term countdown
  • Traditional Chinese colors
  • Short explanations for each term
  • Countdown widgets
  • Support for Sanfu and Shujiu tracking
Features
Read full description

* 节气倒计时,展示距离下一个节气还有多少天。 * 每个节气附上中国传统颜色和简短描述,直观了解每一个节气。 * 倒计时小组件,更便捷的使用方式。 * 还支持三伏和数九哦。

About

年号干支表

Access a comprehensive 2000-year historical database of Chinese imperial reign titles and their corresponding calendar dates. Quickly search by reign title, calendar year, or emperor to find detailed information and convert between Gregorian and traditional Chinese calendars.

Highlights
  • 2000-year historical reign title and calendar data
  • Search by reign title, calendar year, or emperor
  • Gregorian and traditional Chinese calendar conversion
  • Daily calendar with lunar, zodiac, and solar terms
  • Dynasty timeline visualization
  • Imperial data statistics
  • Dark mode support
Read full description

《中国年号干支表》——从秦到清,2000年历代年号与干支一键查询。 收录秦、汉、三国、魏晋南北朝、隋、唐、五代十国、宋、辽、金、元、明、清各朝约2000年间的年号、干支、帝王信息,覆盖222位皇帝、428个年号。 【核心功能】 ・年号查询:输入年号关键词,定位对应公历年份与帝王 ・纪年查询:输入公历年份,反查对应年号与干支 ・皇帝查询:输入帝号或姓名,查看其在位年号 ・日历换算:选择任意日期,查看阳历、阴历、干支对照 ・收藏功能:收藏感兴趣的日期,添加备注方便查阅 【特色体验】 ・今日干支:首页实时显示农历日期、干支、生肖、节气 ・朝代时间线:可视化浏览29个朝代的更替脉络 ・数据统计:朝代年号数量排行、皇帝在位时长排行、重名年号趣知 ・暗黑模式:支持跟随系统、浅色、深色三种外观 【为什么需要这个工具?】 中国古籍的纪年方式复杂多样——年号、干支、农历三者交织。 永和九年三月初三是公历哪天?→ 353年4月22日 上元二年九月初九是几月几号?→ 675年10月3日 康熙是哪位皇帝的年号?→ 清圣祖玄烨 在位最久的皇帝是谁?→ 康熙帝,61年 【适合人群】 ・历史研究者和学生 ・古籍阅读、文史爱好者 ・论文写作中需要年代考证的人 ・对中华传统历法感兴趣的人

Screenshots

颜节气3 screens
年号干支表4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: 颜节气 at 3.5 against 年号干支表's 1.0. 颜节气 also leads on review sentiment (33% vs 0%) and ratings volume (4 vs 1). 年号干支表's advantage is monetization model (free vs free with in-app purchases). On price, in-app purchases and iOS requirement there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. 颜节气 sells 1 one-off in-app purchase and 年号干支表 sells 2 one-off in-app purchases. Whichever you choose, the download price is not the number that matters.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

颜节气 holds the better App Store score, 3.5 against 1.0. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 4 and 1 respectively. Written reviews point the same way: 33% of 颜节气's written reviews are positive against 0% of 年号干支表's.

Scorecard5 real differences · 5 level
颜节气 versus 年号干支表: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parameter颜节气年号干支表
PriceFreeFree
Rating3.5 (4 ratings) — better1.0 (1 ratings)
Positive reviews33.3% of reviews — better0.0% of reviews
Number of ratings4 — better1
Update frequencyEvery 2 months—
AdsNo—
In-app purchasesYesYes
MonetizationFree with in-app purchasesFree — better
DevicesiPhone, iPad — better—
Requires iOS16.0 — better17.6
Further details — not scored
Size20 MB33 MB
Age rating4+4+
Developer桂勇 赵洁 陈

Customer experience

颜节气

All ratings3 ratings
Positive33.3%
Neutral33.3%
Negative33.3%
Written reviews3 reviews
Positive33.3%
Neutral66.7%
Negative0.0%

年号干支表

Written reviews1 reviews
Positive0.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative100.0%

In-app purchases

1 purchases

颜节气

One-time1
  • 会员$0.99
2 purchases

年号干支表

One-time2
  • 1yearVip$1.99
  • vip$4.99

Questions

Is 颜节气 free?
颜节气 is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Is 年号干支表 free?
年号干支表 is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Which has better reviews, 颜节气 or 年号干支表?
颜节气 is rated higher. 颜节气 averages 3.5 out of 5 from 4 ratings, while 年号干支表 averages 1.0 from 1 ratings.

Other comparisons