Taking vs CivicLens
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side β with what reviewers say about each.
Taking
Read full descriptionHide full description
Taking Action We believe simple is better than complex. We believe that less is more. We believe that candidates running for elected office and elected officials should provide: a) A safe place for voters and citizens to be directly connected to the democratic process and governance in general b) A way for politicians and citizens to connect in a meaningful way, creating transparency and accountability. c) Enable voters and citizens to directly access and receive information dynamically, real time in a mobile-friendly and visually appealing way. d) A place where candidates and elected officials can focus on informing and educating voters and citizens in a transparent way with un-curated, unfiltered information. Taking Action App is designed with voters, citizens, elected officials and candidates for elected office in mind. Common problems which Taking Action can solve: - Too much information to memorise and recall from websites and mainstream media (especially when environments change rapidly) - Unable to find that email or message from a candidate or politician - Irrelevant information (spam) resulting in voters and candidates missing the critical need to know information - Unable to keep up with a candidate or elected officials and their changes on positions due to ineffective, legacy communications Key benefits: 1) Visual easy to navigate guide to candidates for office and elected officials. 2) Targeted communications based on current issues and/or events 3) Candidate, politician and issue-based streamlined communications 4) Targeted topical resources which are informative and engaging
CivicLens
Read full descriptionHide full description
Civic lens is a voting platform designed to provide citizens a way to vote on issues that impact their lives
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is device support: Taking at 3 against CivicLens's β. Taking also leads on iOS requirement (11.0 vs 15.1). On price and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price Β· Rating Β· Positive reviews Β· Number of ratings Β· Update frequency Β· Ads Β· In-app purchases Β· Monetization Β· Best chart rank Β· Devices Β· Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
| Parameter | Taking | CivicLens |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Update frequency | Every 18 months | β |
| Ads | No | β |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad, iPod β better | β |
| Requires iOS | 11.0 β better | 15.1 |
| Further details β not scored | ||
| Size | 19 MB | 41 MB |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | KREA HOLDINGS LLC | Kaikoo Harrison |
In-app purchases
Taking
No in-app purchases
CivicLens
No in-app purchases




