Comparison

Clinical Guidelines vs DART IGSRT

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Clinical Guidelines

Access dermatologic reference guidelines, documents, and calculators for various skin conditions. Bookmark important sections and use the search function for quick information retrieval on your device.

Highlights
  • Reference guidelines
  • Dermatologic documents
  • Disease calculators
  • Bookmark sections
  • In-app search
Features
Read full description

The AAD Clinical Guidelines app is a digital tool which provides reference guidelines, documents and calculators for several dermatologic related diseases and sub specialties. Bookmark sections for easy reference and utilize search for a quick way of finding information right from your device.

About

DART IGSRT

This app provides evidence-based clinical decision support for treating Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer with Image-Guided Superficial Radiation Therapy. It guides healthcare professionals through a structured assessment of diagnosis, location, tumor features, and patient status to determine treatment appropriateness.

Highlights
  • Step-by-step clinical assessment wizard
  • Interactive body maps for precise location identification
  • Evidence-based appropriateness ratings
  • Clinical rationale and documentation support
  • Offline functionality via PWA technology
  • Detailed results summary with counseling points
Read full description

DART AUC: Evidence-Based Clinical Decision Support for Image-Guided Superficial Radiation Therapy The DART AUC app provides comprehensive, evidence-based clinical decision support for determining the appropriateness of Image-Guided Superficial Radiation Therapy (IGSRT) for Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer (NMSC) treatment. STREAMLINED CLINICAL WORKFLOW Our intuitive step-by-step wizard guides healthcare providers through a structured clinical assessment: • Diagnosis Confirmation – Verify pathologically confirmed NMSC (BCC/SCC) • Anatomic Location – Identify precise tumor location using interactive body maps • Tumor Features – Assess size, histology, depth, and clinical characteristics • Patient Status – Evaluate medical history and treatment contraindications • Review & Submit – Generate comprehensive appropriateness assessment EVIDENCE-BASED CRITERIA Built on the DART Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) Guidelines, the app provides: - Appropriateness ratings (Appropriate, May Be Appropriate, Rarely Appropriate) - Clinical rationale for each determination - Patient counseling considerations - Treatment planning guidance - Documentation support DESIGNED FOR HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS • Medical-Grade Interface – Clean, professional design optimized for clinical use • Progress Tracking – Visual progress indicators throughout the workflow • Comprehensive Assessment – Detailed evaluation of all relevant clinical factors • Instant Results – Immediate appropriateness determination with supporting evidence • Mobile & Tablet Optimized – Works seamlessly on all devices KEY FEATURES Interactive Body Maps Select from detailed anatomic diagrams showing head/neck, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities with precise location identification. Clinical Criteria Integration Evaluate tumor characteristics including: - Size measurements - Histologic subtypes (nodular, superficial, infiltrative, morpheaform, etc.) - High-risk features - Previous treatment history Patient-Centered Assessment Consider relevant patient factors: - Medical contraindications - Treatment history - Clinical presentation Detailed Results Summary Receive comprehensive output including: - Clear appropriateness rating - Evidence-based clinical rationale - Patient counseling talking points - Treatment considerations Offline Capability Progressive Web App (PWA) technology enables: - Full offline functionality - Install directly to home screen - Fast, app-like performance - Automatic updates PROFESSIONAL USE ONLY This application is intended for use by qualified healthcare professionals including dermatologists, radiation oncologists, Mohs surgeons, and other providers involved in NMSC treatment planning. ABOUT DART AUC The DART Appropriate Use Criteria were developed through evidence-based consensus by leading experts in dermatology and radiation oncology to guide clinical decision-making for Image-Guided Superficial Radiation Therapy. PRIVACY & SECURITY • No patient data is transmitted or stored externally • All assessments are processed locally on your device • HIPAA-compliant design • No personal health information collected REQUIREMENTS • iOS 14.0 or later • Internet connection for initial installation • Offline access after installation Download DART AUC today and enhance your clinical decision-making with evidence-based guidance for Image-Guided Superficial Radiation Therapy for Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer. --- Disclaimer: This app is a clinical decision support tool. Final treatment decisions should be made by qualified healthcare providers based on individual patient circumstances and clinical judgment.

Screenshots

Clinical Guidelines4 screens
DART IGSRT4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: DART IGSRT at 5.0 against Clinical Guidelines's 3.7. DART IGSRT also leads on iOS requirement (15.5 vs 17.0). Clinical Guidelines's advantage is ratings volume (3 vs 1). On price, ads, in-app purchases and monetization model there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

DART IGSRT holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 3.7. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 3 and 1 respectively.

Scorecard3 real differences · 7 level
Clinical Guidelines versus DART IGSRT: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterClinical GuidelinesDART IGSRT
PriceFreeFree
Rating3.7 (3 ratings)5.0 (1 ratings) — better
Positive reviews0.0% of reviews—
Number of ratings3 — better1
Update frequencyEvery 38 months—
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod
Requires iOS17.015.5 — better
Further details — not scored
Size35 MB10 MB
Age rating17+17+
DeveloperAmerican Academy of DermatologySkinCure Oncology LLC

Customer experience

Clinical Guidelines

All ratings3 ratings
Positive66.7%
Neutral0.0%
Negative33.3%
Written reviews1 reviews
Positive0.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative100.0%

DART IGSRT

All ratings1 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

None

Clinical Guidelines

No in-app purchases

None

DART IGSRT

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is Clinical Guidelines free?
Clinical Guidelines is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is DART IGSRT free?
DART IGSRT is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, Clinical Guidelines or DART IGSRT?
DART IGSRT is rated higher. Clinical Guidelines averages 3.7 out of 5 from 3 ratings, while DART IGSRT averages 5.0 from 1 ratings.
Do Clinical Guidelines or DART IGSRT have ads?
Neither Clinical Guidelines nor DART IGSRT shows ads.

Other comparisons