Comparison

视网云视界 vs 信通卫士

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

视网云视界

Read full description

提供远程监控视频查看 远程视频录像检索与查看 提供云台控制

About

信通卫士

Read full description

iGuard, an encryption tool designed for mobile communication security, is committed to providing users with comprehensive security communication protection services.

Screenshots

视网云视界3 screens
信通卫士4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: 信通卫士 at 5.0 against 视网云视界's 1.0. 信通卫士 also leads on device support. 视网云视界's advantage is iOS requirement (11.0 vs 15). On price, ratings volume and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

信通卫士 holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 1.0. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 1 and 1 respectively.

Scorecard3 real differences · 6 level
视网云视界 versus 信通卫士: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parameter视网云视界信通卫士
PriceFreeFree
Rating1.0 (1 ratings)5.0 (1 ratings) — better
Positive reviews—100.0% of reviews
Number of ratings11
Update frequency—Every 2 months
Ads—No
In-app purchasesNoNo
Devices—iPhone, iPod — better
Requires iOS11.0 — better15
Further details — not scored
Size56 MB322 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperChengdu Xinyu Technology Co., Ltd.China Academy of Telecommunication Research of MIIT

In-app purchases

None

视网云视界

No in-app purchases

None

信通卫士

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is 视网云视界 free?
视网云视界 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is 信通卫士 free?
信通卫士 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, 视网云视界 or 信通卫士?
信通卫士 is rated higher. 视网云视界 averages 1.0 out of 5 from 1 ratings, while 信通卫士 averages 5.0 from 1 ratings.

Other comparisons