Comparison

视网云视界 vs 小亿同学

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

视网云视界

Read full description

提供远程监控视频查看 远程视频录像检索与查看 提供云台控制

About

小亿同学

Features
Read full description

实时远程监控,可实现远程视频监控和管理功能,供摄像头实时视频,SD卡历史回放,云存功能,人形侦测,移动侦测等服务功能

Screenshots

视网云视界3 screens
小亿同学4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: 小亿同学 at 1.5 against 视网云视界's 1.0. 小亿同学 also leads on ratings volume (8 vs 1) and device support. 视网云视界's advantage is iOS requirement (11.0 vs 13.0). On price and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

小亿同学 holds the better App Store score, 1.5 against 1.0. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: 小亿同学 has 8 ratings behind it against 1, so its average is the more settled of the two.

Scorecard4 real differences · 5 level
视网云视界 versus 小亿同学: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parameter视网云视界小亿同学
PriceFreeFree
Rating1.0 (1 ratings)1.5 (8 ratings) — better
Positive reviews—0.0% of reviews
Number of ratings18 — better
Update frequency—Every 3 weeks
Ads—Yes
In-app purchasesNoNo
Devices—iPhone, iPod — better
Requires iOS11.0 — better13.0
Further details — not scored
Size56 MB182 MB
Age rating4+12+
DeveloperChengdu Xinyu Technology Co., Ltd.中亿(深圳)信息科技有限公司

In-app purchases

None

视网云视界

No in-app purchases

None

小亿同学

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is 视网云视界 free?
视网云视界 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is 小亿同学 free?
小亿同学 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, 视网云视界 or 小亿同学?
小亿同学 is rated higher. 视网云视界 averages 1.0 out of 5 from 1 ratings, while 小亿同学 averages 1.5 from 8 ratings.

Other comparisons