Comparison

WAS vs AuthSky

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

WAS

Easily switch between mobile and desktop website views with a single click. Test your own websites or browse any site as it would appear on different devices using custom user-agent strings. This browser simplifies cross-device testing without needing emulators.

Highlights
  • Switch between mobile and desktop views
  • Change user-agent strings
  • Built-in WebView browser
  • Add custom user agents
  • Quick compatibility testing settings
  • Content verification tools
Features
Read full description

The WAS browser allows you to switch between mobile and desktop views of a website with one click. Now you can browse any site or test your own by changing the user-agent string—which determines how the website is displayed. With the built-in WebView browser, you can see how your site will look on various smartphones, screens, and devices without needing to buy them or install additional emulators. WAS offers a wide range of built-in user agents, but if they aren't enough, you can easily add or create your own. Additionally, the application includes many built-in settings for quick compatibility testing and content verification. Download the app now and say goodbye to the hassle of testing websites on different devices!

About

AuthSky

Features
Read full description

Introducing AuthSky System, a cutting-edge authentication solution designed to enhance security, usability, and flexibility in managing Time-based One-Time Passwords (TOTP) and other authentication methods. With robust features to secure sensitive data and ensure seamless user experiences, AuthSky supports modern authentication workflows across multiple devices and platforms. Download it now from the Apple Store and enjoy enhanced security at your fingertips!

Screenshots

WAS3 screens
AuthSky4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is price: AuthSky at Free against WAS's $2.49. AuthSky also leads on iOS requirement (12.0 vs 16.0). WAS's advantage is update cadence (fortnightly vs every 2 months). On ads, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

AuthSky is free to download; WAS costs $2.49 up front. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

WAS ships an update fortnightly, AuthSky every 2 months. The most recent releases landed on October 12, 2026 and October 2, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard3 real differences · 7 level
WAS versus AuthSky: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterWASAuthSky
Price$2.49Free — better
Rating4.6 (95 ratings) — better—
Positive reviews53.8% of reviews—
Number of ratings95 — better—
Update frequencyFortnightly — betterEvery 2 months
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationPaid—
DevicesiPhone, iPad, MaciPhone, iPad, iPod
Requires iOS16.012.0 — better
Further details — not scored
Size10 MB46 MB
Age rating17+12+
DeveloperAndreii SimaranovHawsabah

In-app purchases

None

WAS

No in-app purchases

None

AuthSky

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is WAS free?
WAS costs $2.49, with no in-app purchases.
Is AuthSky free?
AuthSky is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Do WAS or AuthSky have ads?
Neither WAS nor AuthSky shows ads.
Which is updated more often, WAS or AuthSky?
WAS ships an update fortnightly, and AuthSky every 2 months. Most recently, WAS was updated on October 12, 2026 and AuthSky on October 2, 2026.

Other comparisons