medEaze vs GymBets
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
medEaze
Read full descriptionHide full description
medEaze reads medical tests and translates your results into easier-to-understand language. Please consult a medical professional while using this application, medEaze alone cannot prescribe or diagnose any medical decisions.
GymBets
This app uses a group-based system with virtual stakes to encourage users to meet their fitness goals. Participants submit daily proofs of their gym activity, and those who fail to meet their goals or submit invalid proofs risk losing their stake to the rest of the group.
- Group accountability cohorts
- Virtual asset staking
- Daily proof of gym activity
- Consensus-based validation
- Stake slashing for non-compliance
- Incentivizes habit formation
Read full descriptionHide full description
GymBets combines self-accountability with a group environment to provide a platform that promotes discipline, our app incentivizes discipline through virtual stakes by matching users in a cohort of 8 total people, all of which stake some sort of assets into the pool. Through a tendermint style PBFT consensus algorithm, stakers have to submit proofs every day that they are keeping up with their gym goals whether than be submitting a picture of them at the gym or really any sort of proof that gets 2/3s of validators to approve the proof. The first two people in the cohort to slip up and either fail their discipline goals or submit a non-intuitive proof (likely meaning they skipped the gym and lied) get their stake slashed and distributed evenly amongst the rest of the cohort. The thesis of GymBets is that in a perfect scenario where an individual is 100 percent disciplined - there is no way for them to lose, rather only letting them win on our app. Furthermore, when coupled with a stake our app actually incentivizes users to routinely go to the gym and make it a habit for them. Our app creates a win-win situation with going to the gym, letting users get more into fitness while also making fake money.
Screenshots
Verdict
medEaze and GymBets are too close to call on the numbers: across 5 compared parameters — price, ads, in-app purchases and device support among them — neither pulls far enough ahead to decide it. What separates them is feature set and interface, not measurable difference.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
| Parameter | medEaze | GymBets |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | — | 1.0 (1 ratings) — better |
| Positive reviews | — | 0.0% of reviews |
| Number of ratings | — | 1 — better |
| Update frequency | — | Every 3 weeks |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Monetization | — | Free |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad, iPod | iPhone, iPad, iPod |
| Requires iOS | 15.0 — better | 15.1 |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 4 MB | 69 MB |
| Age rating | 17+ | 17+ |
| Developer | Priya Ganguly | Anthony Kobzar |
In-app purchases
medEaze
No in-app purchases
GymBets
No in-app purchases









