Comparison

随手便签 vs 定位打卡

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

随手便签

This app helps you quickly record important information, ideas, and reminders. It offers various note types, organization tools, and reminder functions to keep you on track. Sync across devices and share notes with others.

Highlights
  • Multiple note types (text, list, image, voice)
  • Categorization and tagging
  • Customizable reminders
  • Cloud sync and backup
  • Search functionality
  • Note sharing
Read full description

描述: 随手便签APP是一款旨在帮助用户快速、方便地记录重要信息、想法、提醒事项和备忘录的移动应用程序。 1. **简单直观的界面**:随手便签APP提供直观的用户界面,使用户可以轻松创建、编辑和管理便签。无论是新手还是经验丰富的用户,都可以轻松上手。 2. **多种便签类型**:用户可以创建文本便签、清单便签、图像便签、语音便签等多种类型的便签,以满足不同的记录需求。 3. **分类和标签**:用户可以将便签分类或添加标签,以便更轻松地组织和查找信息。这有助于快速过滤和访问特定主题或项目的便签。 4. **提醒功能**:随手便签APP允许用户设置提醒,以确保不会忘记重要的任务或约会。用户可以选择日期和时间,接收通知,以便按时完成任务。 5. **同步和备份**:该应用程序通常提供与云存储的集成,如云端硬盘或iCloud等,以确保便签可以在多个设备上同步和备份。这有助于避免数据丢失。 6. **安全和隐私**:用户的便签数据通常受到安全措施的保护,以确保隐私和敏感信息的安全。 7. **搜索功能**:随手便签APP通常提供强大的搜索功能,用户可以通过关键词或标签轻松查找他们的便签。 8. **自定义选项**:用户可以自定义便签的外观、颜色和字体,以使其个性化,更符合他们的喜好。 9. **分享功能**:用户可以分享特定便签或便签集合给其他人,以便协作或与朋友和家人分享重要信息。 订阅: 1、 用户只有在通过付费订阅后才可以无限次使用便签功能,去除广告等功能; 2、订阅费用会在用户确认购买时从 iTunes 账户扣除,可自动续订,续费298/年; 3、用户可在当前订阅结束 24 小时前关闭自动续订,否则将自动续订; 4、自动续期订阅的 Apple ID,会在每个账单周期到期前24小时,自动在iTunes账户扣费并延长相应有效期; 5、用户对订阅服务进行管理,即购买后可以前往用户账户设置关闭自动订阅。 隐私政策:https://docs.qq.com/doc/DY1FWaGRPVERlUkJi 会员协议: https://docs.qq.com/doc/DY2pGRm1ZUldWTGVj

About

定位打卡

This tool helps you manage daily attendance and habits with precise reminders and clear data visualization. Track work commutes and build positive routines with a user-friendly interface.

Highlights
  • Attendance tracking
  • Habit tracking
  • Data statistics
  • Precise reminders
  • Subscription plans
Read full description

定位打卡是考勤生活必备的打卡工具,可以帮助你快速实现上下班通勤打卡、习惯打卡等,让您体验不一样的打卡体验。 功能简介: - 打卡考勤 自由设置工作日考勤、精确提醒 - 数据统计 每日打卡考勤数据清晰呈现 - 日常习惯 日常习惯打卡统计,养成良好的生活习惯。 - 隐私政策 http://qqdk.other1.site/yinsi.html。 - 服务协议 http://qqdk.other1.site/fuwu.html。 -订阅说明 App Store官方订阅功能为自动续费订阅,iTunes Account进行确认支付。用户需手动在iTunes/Apple ID设置管理中管理自动续订功能,如果订阅期结束前的24小时内未关闭自动续订功能,订阅周期将会自动延续。如果您想取消订阅,请在您的iOS设备上前往“设置”-->选择“iTunes Store与App Store”-->点击“Apple ID”,接下来选择“查看AppleID”,进入“帐户设置” ,点击“订阅”-->“管理”,并选择对应的订阅,之后便可取消订阅。

Screenshots

随手便签3 screens
定位打卡3 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: 定位打卡 at 5.0 against 随手便签's 3.0. On price, ratings volume, in-app purchases and monetization model there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. 随手便签 sells 3 in-app purchases, starting at $4.99 per month and 定位打卡 sells 3 in-app purchases, starting at $1.99 per month. Whichever you choose, the download price is not the number that matters.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

定位打卡 holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 3.0. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 1 and 1 respectively.

Scorecard1 real difference · 5 level
随手便签 versus 定位打卡: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parameter随手便签定位打卡
PriceFreeFree
Rating3.0 (1 ratings)5.0 (1 ratings) — better
Number of ratings11
In-app purchasesYesYes
MonetizationFreemiumFreemium
Requires iOS12.0 — better12.4
Further details — not scored
Size7 MB10 MB
Age rating4+4+
Developer雅庆 王坪 王

In-app purchases

3 purchases

随手便签

Subscriptions3
  • 月费会员$4.991 Month
  • 季度会员$24.993 Months
  • 年费会员3 Days trial$39.991 Year
3 purchases

定位打卡

Subscriptions2
  • 通勤打卡助手月会员$1.991 Month
  • 通勤打卡助手年会员$19.991 Year
One-time1
  • 通勤打卡助手永久会员$24.99

Questions

Is 随手便签 free?
随手便签 is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Is 定位打卡 free?
定位打卡 is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Which has better reviews, 随手便签 or 定位打卡?
定位打卡 is rated higher. 随手便签 averages 3.0 out of 5 from 1 ratings, while 定位打卡 averages 5.0 from 1 ratings.

Other comparisons