e vs MIT
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
e
This application displays the progress of activities undertaken by Panchayati Raj Institutions in India. It aims to provide citizens with increased transparency and access to information, extending the functionality of its web portal.
- Showcases PRI activity progress
- Enhances transparency
- Provides citizen access to information
- Extension of web portal functionality
Read full descriptionHide full description
eGramSwaraj is a mobile phone application that showcases the progress of various activities taken up by the Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs). It has been developed with an emphasis on extending greater transparency and access to information to the citizens of India. eGramSwaraj mobile application acts as a natural extension to the eGramSwaraj web portal (https://egramswaraj.gov.in/) which is one of the applications under e-Panchayat Mission Mode Project (MMP) of Ministry of Panchayati Raj (MoPR).
MIT
Read full descriptionHide full description
MIT-AOE SeQR Scan is a QR & 1D BarCode scanner which can be used for a broad range of applications in real-time. It can read encrypted QR codes and 1D Barcodes which are printed on Government documents, Educational certificates, mark sheet and many more. System, we provide as SEQR Documents, used to generate such documents uses a combination of various security algorithms to create a QR code & not so easy to duplicate security features. Not only the issuer of the documents can scan and obtain the certificate, also the public users can register for free and perform the same operations. This application, after scan, provides the preview of the certificate and other document data that can be compared with the in-hand document. MIT-AOE SeQR Scan, in Kenya, takes care of the documents and the solution.
Screenshots
Verdict
e and MIT are too close to call on the numbers: across 5 compared parameters — price, ads, in-app purchases and device support among them — neither pulls far enough ahead to decide it. What separates them is feature set and interface, not measurable difference.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
| Parameter | e | MIT |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | 5.0 (1 ratings) — better | — |
| Positive reviews | 0.0% of reviews | — |
| Number of ratings | 1 — better | — |
| Update frequency | — | Every 4 months |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Monetization | Free | — |
| Devices | iPhone, iPod | iPhone, iPod |
| Requires iOS | 12.0 | 11.0 — better |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 28 MB | 9 MB |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | NIC | SECURITY SOFTWARE & SOLUTIONS LLP |
In-app purchases
e
No in-app purchases
MIT
No in-app purchases









