Comparison

e vs MIT

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

e

This application displays the progress of activities undertaken by Panchayati Raj Institutions in India. It aims to provide citizens with increased transparency and access to information, extending the functionality of its web portal.

Highlights
  • Showcases PRI activity progress
  • Enhances transparency
  • Provides citizen access to information
  • Extension of web portal functionality
Features
Read full description

eGramSwaraj is a mobile phone application that showcases the progress of various activities taken up by the Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs). It has been developed with an emphasis on extending greater transparency and access to information to the citizens of India. eGramSwaraj mobile application acts as a natural extension to the eGramSwaraj web portal (https://egramswaraj.gov.in/) which is one of the applications under e-Panchayat Mission Mode Project (MMP) of Ministry of Panchayati Raj (MoPR).

About

MIT

Features
Read full description

MIT-AOE SeQR Scan is a QR & 1D BarCode scanner which can be used for a broad range of applications in real-time. It can read encrypted QR codes and 1D Barcodes which are printed on Government documents, Educational certificates, mark sheet and many more. System, we provide as SEQR Documents, used to generate such documents uses a combination of various security algorithms to create a QR code & not so easy to duplicate security features. Not only the issuer of the documents can scan and obtain the certificate, also the public users can register for free and perform the same operations. This application, after scan, provides the preview of the certificate and other document data that can be compared with the in-hand document. MIT-AOE SeQR Scan, in Kenya, takes care of the documents and the solution.

Screenshots

e4 screens
MIT4 screens

Verdict

The call

e and MIT are too close to call on the numbers: across 5 compared parameters — price, ads, in-app purchases and device support among them — neither pulls far enough ahead to decide it. What separates them is feature set and interface, not measurable difference.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ScorecardNo meaningful differences
e versus MIT: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParametereMIT
PriceFreeFree
Rating5.0 (1 ratings) — better—
Positive reviews0.0% of reviews—
Number of ratings1 — better—
Update frequency—Every 4 months
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFree—
DevicesiPhone, iPodiPhone, iPod
Requires iOS12.011.0 — better
Further details — not scored
Size28 MB9 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperNICSECURITY SOFTWARE & SOLUTIONS LLP

In-app purchases

None

e

No in-app purchases

None

MIT

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is e free?
e is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is MIT free?
MIT is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Do e or MIT have ads?
Neither e nor MIT shows ads.

Other comparisons