Comparison

Inner Armor vs ClippdU

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Inner Armor

Enhance athletic resilience and reach peak performance with advanced training techniques. This app integrates with a sensor to track key physiological metrics like heart rate and body temperature. It is designed for training purposes and not for medical use.

Highlights
  • Performance training techniques
  • Resilience enhancement
  • Heart rate detection
  • Body temperature monitoring
  • Skin conductance tracking
  • Respiration monitoring
Features
Read full description

Inner Armor performance training app trains athletes to reach peak performance by allowing them to use a series of different techniques to enhance their resilience. The app integrates with TPS eVU sensor which enables detection of heart rate, body temperature, skin conductance and respiration. Disclaimer: this app and its affiliated device is NOT for medical use. Users should seek a doctor’s advice in addition to using this app and before making any medical decisions.

About

ClippdU

Read full description

ClippdU is for college golfers. It shows your entire college career and the numbers behind your performances, powered by the data collected in Scoreboard – the same data that was always there but not available to you. No logging. No tracking. Just play. The moment results are published, ClippdU automatically shows exactly how you performed against your competition – hole-by-hole against every player who teed it up on that day, on that course, in those conditions. Every round in every tournament. ClippdU is your entire college career. Your college career. Your data. In your hands. ClippdU Features - Every round and tournament in Scoreboard, automatically shows in ClippdU. No input from you. - Every round measured against the field: your position, your score against the average, how many went under and over par, how close to the lead. - Go deeper into any round or tournament: 9s, 18s, 36-hole AM/PM splits, hole by hole and key holes, momentum through the round, scoring distribution and par 3/4/5 by distance. - Your career, always building: ranking and its trend, counting rounds and patterns, average finish, wins, top 3s and top 10s, and recent scoring trends. - Personal bests highlighted the moment you set them, round, season and career. - See your strengths and weaknesses against your peers, and slice everything by division, conference, team, course or time period. - Nothing to buy, wear, track or log.

Screenshots

Inner Armor4 screens
ClippdU4 screens

Verdict

The call

Inner Armor and ClippdU are too close to call on the numbers: across 5 compared parameters — price, ads, in-app purchases and device support among them — neither pulls far enough ahead to decide it. What separates them is feature set and interface, not measurable difference.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ScorecardNo meaningful differences
Inner Armor versus ClippdU: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterInner ArmorClippdU
PriceFreeFree
Rating5.0 (40 ratings) — better—
Positive reviews100.0% of reviews—
Number of ratings40 — better—
Update frequencyEvery 2 weeks—
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFree—
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPod — betteriPhone, iPod
Requires iOS15.115.1
Further details — not scored
Size304 MB57 MB
Age rating17+4+
DeveloperInner ArmorCLIPPD LIMITED

In-app purchases

None

Inner Armor

No in-app purchases

None

ClippdU

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is Inner Armor free?
Inner Armor is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is ClippdU free?
ClippdU is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Do Inner Armor or ClippdU have ads?
Neither Inner Armor nor ClippdU shows ads.

Other comparisons