Comparison

3DFaceScan vs Logical Ink 8.6

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

3DFaceScan

This free demo application showcases the power of the TrueDepth camera to create detailed 3D models of faces. It captures depth and color data to generate a realistic 3D representation directly on your device. Requires an iOS device with a TrueDepth camera.

Highlights
  • TrueDepth camera integration
  • On-device 3D model creation
  • Depth and color data streaming
  • Face scanning and visualization
  • Free demo application
Features
Read full description

Free demo application to show the capabilities of TrueDepth camera powered by Structure SDK. Designed for everyone to allow them to easily scan their face and visualize its 3D model. Our app uses the TrueDepth camera to stream depth data and color images. We use that data (on device) to create a 3D model of the face of the person being scanned. REQUIREMENTS: 3DFaceScan requires an iOS device with integrated TrueDepth front-facing camera system, such as any iPad Pro or iPhone X or later (11, 12 and onward). Terms of Use: https://www.apple.com/legal/internet-services/itunes/dev/stdeula/ Privacy Policy: https://structure.io/privacy

About

Logical Ink 8.6

This app allows healthcare organizations to electronically capture patient data and signatures, replacing paper forms. It streamlines workflows, reduces errors, and enhances patient safety with an intuitive, mobile-friendly interface. Requires a licensed user account for access.

Highlights
  • Electronic data and signature capture
  • Reduces errors and improves patient safety
  • Streamlined registration workflow
  • Mobile and bedside care enabled
  • Integrates with EMR/ECM systems
  • Intelligent and interactive forms
Read full description

Logical Ink® makes it easy for healthcare organizations to allow patients and caregivers to capture data and signatures electronically, eliminating the need for paper forms. Seamlessly compatible with any downstream system, Logical Ink helps improve documentation, decrease medical errors, and simplify processes. It leverages mobile devices, digital ink and a pen/touch-based interface to provide a simple and intuitive user experience that is as natural and unrestrictive as paper. You must be a licensed user of Logical Ink to use this app. Logical Ink customers enjoy the following benefits: • Intelligent and interactive forms for capturing electronic signature, discrete data and photos • Reduces errors and improves patient safety by eliminating paper forms and scanning • Increased staff and patient satisfaction • Reduces wait times in Registration with a more streamlined workflow • Enables mobility and bedside care • Easy-to-use, drag/drop design tool for enterprise forms management • Integrates with any EMR or ECM workflow for fewer clicks 8.6 Highlights: • Introduced the Partial Date control support to all clients for capturing date values with unknown or ambiguous values. • Added support for the _GetControlVisibility() method to all clients. • Implemented the _GetValidationChanges() method for finding a form's validation rule changes during runtime. • Introduced the _GetValidationRules() method for interrogating a form's validation rules to check for status and count. • All forms now have a Validate method that is fired after any change to form validation rules. • Updated form fill in all clients to show Signature controls with the Final property enabled in the Validation List. • Added a new Text File output destination that generates an ASCII text file when forms are submitted to the server. • PreBoard can be enabled or disabled independently of PreCapture using a new application configuration setting. • Added support for the _GetDataSource() method, which can be used to load supplemental data from external sources. • Added a Form Events dialog to the Designer Test Window for watching changes to events in real time. • Barcodes now render in the form fill window in the HTML client. • Added support for hosting applications to listen for form events. • Introduced the Web SDK, which allows implementers to deploy the Logical Ink form fill experience without the use of a client or Logical Ink database.

Screenshots

3DFaceScan4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: Logical Ink 8.6 at 5.0 against 3DFaceScan's 4.0. 3DFaceScan's advantage is device support and iOS requirement (13.0 vs 16.0). On price, ratings volume, in-app purchases and monetization model there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

Logical Ink 8.6 holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 4.0. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 2 and 1 respectively.

Scorecard3 real differences · 7 level
3DFaceScan versus Logical Ink 8.6: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parameter3DFaceScanLogical Ink 8.6
PriceFreeFree
Rating4.0 (2 ratings)5.0 (1 ratings) — better
Positive reviews100.0% of reviews—
Number of ratings2 — better1
Update frequencyEvery 5 weeks—
AdsNo—
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPod — better—
Requires iOS13.0 — better16.0
Further details — not scored
Size22 MB30 MB
Age rating4+12+
DeveloperXRPro, LLCBottomline Technologies

In-app purchases

None

3DFaceScan

No in-app purchases

None

Logical Ink 8.6

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is 3DFaceScan free?
3DFaceScan is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is Logical Ink 8.6 free?
Logical Ink 8.6 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, 3DFaceScan or Logical Ink 8.6?
Logical Ink 8.6 is rated higher. 3DFaceScan averages 4.0 out of 5 from 2 ratings, while Logical Ink 8.6 averages 5.0 from 1 ratings.

Other comparisons