EnLink vs 羽球排場王
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
EnLink
Read full descriptionHide full description
- 提供行動能源管理方案。 - 透視各負載迴路用電。 - 能源組成可視化功能協助洞見能源使用效率。 - 依設定之迴路供電優先級。 - 建立可持續追蹤的能源績效，加速達成減碳目標。
羽球排場王
Read full descriptionHide full description
為羽球團體活動愛好者，提供安排會員配對上場，公平共享有限的場地資源，提升活動參與體驗。 Terms of Use: https://www.apple.com/legal/internet-services/itunes/dev/stdeula/ Privacy Policy: https://www.privacypolicies.com/live/a376bdf3-4708-49ff-8f45-a2282fa1d601
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is in-app purchases: EnLink at none against 羽球排場王's 1. 羽球排場王's advantage is device support. On price and iOS requirement there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. 羽球排場王 sells 1 in-app purchase, starting at $5.99 per year. EnLink asks for nothing beyond the download.
| Parameter | EnLink | 羽球排場王 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Update frequency | — | Every 6 days |
| Ads | — | No |
| In-app purchases | No — better | Yes |
| Devices | — | iPhone, iPad, iPod — better |
| Requires iOS | 14.1 | 13.0 — better |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 1 MB | 34 MB |
| Age rating | 17+ | 4+ |
| Developer | AUO Corporation | CHI TING HSU |
In-app purchases
EnLink
No in-app purchases
羽球排場王
- Badminton King Annual Support$5.991 Year
