Comparison

Accessibility Techniques vs Fonty McFontface

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Accessibility Techniques

This app provides iOS SwiftUI sample code for accessibility techniques, demonstrating good and bad practices. It helps developers learn how to apply WCAG guidelines to their apps with searchable examples and source code.

Highlights
  • iOS SwiftUI sample code
  • WCAG accessibility techniques
  • Good and bad examples
  • VoiceOver testing
  • Searchable index
  • Project source code
Features
Read full description

Learn how to build accessible iOS apps by seeing the same component done right and done wrong, side by side. Accessibility Techniques is a working reference of 89 SwiftUI techniques. Every one ships a good and a bad example you can test yourself with VoiceOver turned on, so you hear the difference a proper accessibility label makes and what breaks when focus is not managed. Each technique maps to the WCAG 2.2 success criteria it satisfies. What's inside • 89 techniques in a searchable, alphabetical index • Good and bad examples side by side, each with a Details note explaining exactly why it passes or fails • Coverage of VoiceOver, Voice Control, Dynamic Type, Dark Mode, Reduce Motion, Increase Contrast, Smart Invert, and more • Written documentation for every technique, linked to the relevant WCAG criteria and Apple's developer docs • A companion watchOS app Who it's for Developers, designers, and QA who need to settle a question quickly, verify a real VoiceOver announcement before shipping, or show a teammate why a pattern fails. Open source The full SwiftUI source is on GitHub, so you can read how each example is built and copy what you need. The project also includes a11y-check, a free static analysis tool that scans your own Swift code for accessibility issues — 43 rules across 23 WCAG 2.2 criteria. https://github.com/cvs-health/ios-swiftui-accessibility-techniques Issues, suggestions, and contributions welcome.

About

Fonty McFontface

This tool helps developers visualize and compare system font sizes and styles for SwiftUI projects. It offers customization for font design, weight, width, and dynamic sizing, with a macOS menu bar app for quick access.

Highlights
  • System font visualization
  • Font size comparison
  • Customization options
  • Dynamic font sizing
  • macOS Menu Bar app
Read full description

A simple font tool for developers working with SwiftUI. If you're like me, you are always forgetting the hierarchy of font sizes: Which one's bigger again, callout or footnote? So I built this free visualizer tool for iPhone that shows them all in a neat list, and has customization options for font design, weight, width, and dynamic font sizes. Also available on macOS with a Menu Bar Extra app for fast access when you're using Xcode.

Screenshots

Accessibility Techniques4 screens
Fonty McFontface2 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: Accessibility Techniques at 5.0 against Fonty McFontface's 4.5. Accessibility Techniques also leads on in-app purchases (none vs 3) and update cadence (every 3 days vs every 2 months). On price, review sentiment, ratings volume and ads there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Fonty McFontface sells 3 one-off in-app purchases. Accessibility Techniques asks for nothing beyond the download.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

Accessibility Techniques holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 4.5. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 15 and 8 respectively. Written reviews split almost evenly too, at 100% and 100% positive.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

Accessibility Techniques ships an update every 3 days, Fonty McFontface every 2 months. The most recent releases landed on October 5, 2026 and October 8, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard4 real differences · 6 level
Accessibility Techniques versus Fonty McFontface: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterAccessibility TechniquesFonty McFontface
PriceFreeFree
Rating5.0 (15 ratings) — better4.5 (8 ratings)
Positive reviews100.0% of reviews100.0% of reviews
Number of ratings15 — better8
Update frequencyEvery 3 days — betterEvery 2 months
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNo — betterYes
MonetizationFree — betterFree with in-app purchases
DevicesiPhone, iPad, Apple WatchiPhone, iPad, Mac
Requires iOS1717.0
Further details — not scored
Size7 MB1 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperPaulJAdam.comDavid Steppenbeck

Customer experience

Accessibility Techniques

All ratings15 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%
Written reviews3 reviews
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

Fonty McFontface

All ratings8 ratings
Positive87.5%
Neutral0.0%
Negative12.5%
Written reviews1 reviews
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

None

Accessibility Techniques

No in-app purchases

3 purchases

Fonty McFontface

One-time3
  • Snack Tip$0.99
  • Coffee Tip$1.99
  • Lunch Tip$4.99

Questions

Is Accessibility Techniques free?
Accessibility Techniques is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is Fonty McFontface free?
Fonty McFontface is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Which has better reviews, Accessibility Techniques or Fonty McFontface?
Accessibility Techniques is rated higher. Accessibility Techniques averages 5.0 out of 5 from 15 ratings, while Fonty McFontface averages 4.5 from 8 ratings.
Do Accessibility Techniques or Fonty McFontface have ads?
Neither Accessibility Techniques nor Fonty McFontface shows ads.
Which is updated more often, Accessibility Techniques or Fonty McFontface?
Accessibility Techniques ships an update every 3 days, and Fonty McFontface every 2 months. Most recently, Accessibility Techniques was updated on October 5, 2026 and Fonty McFontface on October 8, 2026.

Other comparisons