Comparison

园艺大师 vs 作业通知

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

园艺大师

Identify plants, learn about gardening, and access a wealth of horticultural knowledge. This app offers a rich, open-access resource with a simple interface for easy navigation and operation.

Highlights
  • Plant identification
  • Extensive gardening knowledge
  • Indoor and outdoor plant information
  • Rich and engaging content
  • Free to use
  • Simple interface
Features
Read full description

园艺大师 - 庭院、室内外观赏植物全知道 产品特点: •内容丰富,精选内容,百看不厌。 •完全开放,不用花钱即可享受。 •简洁界面,方便操作。

About

作业通知

Features
Read full description

作业登记通知神器,支持文本、图片双格式上传,一键将作业内容推送到个人微信公众号,爸妈再也不用每天群里问别人了。

Screenshots

园艺大师3 screens
作业通知1 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is ads: 作业通知 at none against 园艺大师's shown. 作业通知 also leads on iOS requirement (13.0 vs 15.0). On price, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

Scorecard2 real differences · 7 level
园艺大师 versus 作业通知: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parameter园艺大师作业通知
PriceFreeFree
Rating5.0 (1 ratings) — better—
Number of ratings1 — better—
Update frequencyFortnightly—
AdsYesNo — better
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationAd-supported—
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod
Requires iOS15.013.0 — better
Further details — not scored
Size39 MB2 MB
Age rating4+4+
Developer浩杰 姬深圳市易新科技有限公司

In-app purchases

None

园艺大师

No in-app purchases

None

作业通知

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is 园艺大师 free?
园艺大师 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is 作业通知 free?
作业通知 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Do 园艺大师 or 作业通知 have ads?
园艺大师 shows ads; 作业通知 does not.

Other comparisons