Comparison

ECO Battery vs EnerocHelper

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

ECO Battery

Monitor and manage your lithium battery's health and performance. Optimize charging and discharging cycles to extend battery lifespan. Get detailed insights into your battery's status.

Highlights
  • Lithium battery management
  • BMS monitoring
  • Performance optimization
  • Charging cycle control
  • Discharging cycle control
  • Battery health insights
Features
Read full description

Eco Battery lithium BMS

About

EnerocHelper

Manage and monitor your energy devices remotely. Upgrade firmware via 4G or Bluetooth, switch between Chinese and English languages, and export historical data. Keep your devices securely bound to your control.

Highlights
  • Remote firmware upgrades (4G/Bluetooth)
  • Dual language support (Chinese/English)
  • Historical data export
  • Device binding and control
  • Future language additions
Features
Read full description

[Upgrade Method] The BMS can be upgraded remotely via the 4G module, or through Bluetooth. [Language Support] Chinese and English switching is currently supported, with more languages to be added in the future. Stay tuned. [Data Export] Historical data of the current device can be exported. [Device Binding] Your device is under your control. More features are coming soon!

Screenshots

ECO Battery4 screens
EnerocHelper4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: EnerocHelper at 5.0 against ECO Battery's 4.0. ECO Battery's advantage is ratings volume (22 vs 1) and iOS requirement (12.0 vs 15.6). On price, update cadence, ads and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

EnerocHelper holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 4.0. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: ECO Battery has 22 ratings behind it against 1, so its average is the more settled of the two.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

ECO Battery ships an update fortnightly, EnerocHelper every 9 days. The most recent releases landed on November 4, 2026 and October 30, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard3 real differences · 7 level
ECO Battery versus EnerocHelper: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterECO BatteryEnerocHelper
PriceFreeFree
Rating4.0 (22 ratings)5.0 (1 ratings) — better
Positive reviews63.6% of reviews—
Number of ratings22 — better1
Update frequencyFortnightlyEvery 9 days — better
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPod — betteriPhone, iPod
Requires iOS12.0 — better15.6
Further details — not scored
Size31 MB45 MB
Age rating17+17+
DeveloperEco Capital, Inc.杭州鹏成新能源科技有限公司

Customer experience

ECO Battery

All ratings19 ratings
Positive73.7%
Neutral0.0%
Negative26.3%
Written reviews11 reviews
Positive63.6%
Neutral0.0%
Negative36.4%

EnerocHelper

All ratings1 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

None

ECO Battery

No in-app purchases

None

EnerocHelper

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is ECO Battery free?
ECO Battery is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is EnerocHelper free?
EnerocHelper is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, ECO Battery or EnerocHelper?
EnerocHelper is rated higher. ECO Battery averages 4.0 out of 5 from 22 ratings, while EnerocHelper averages 5.0 from 1 ratings.
Do ECO Battery or EnerocHelper have ads?
Neither ECO Battery nor EnerocHelper shows ads.
Which is updated more often, ECO Battery or EnerocHelper?
ECO Battery ships an update fortnightly, and EnerocHelper every 9 days. Most recently, ECO Battery was updated on November 4, 2026 and EnerocHelper on October 30, 2026.

Other comparisons