Comparison

好运记牌器 vs 百家牌记分器

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

好运记牌器

Read full description

好运记牌器,一款 AI 驱动的全自动智能记牌工具,支持 200+ 热门棋牌游戏。它以极速识别和便捷操作,助您轻松记录牌局,提升游戏胜率。 【产品特点】 1、记牌快准,毫秒级识别。 2、界面友好,易于操作。 3、广泛兼容,支持多种游戏。 4、支持多人模式,自定义玩法。 5、免费试用,专业客服支持。 会员订阅说明: 1. 付款:用户确认购买并付款后会通过 iTunes 账户直接支付。 2. 取消续订:如需取消续订,请在当前订阅到期 24 小时以前,手动在 iTunes/Apple ID 设置管理中关闭自动续订功能。 3. 自动续订:苹果 iTunes 账户会在到期前 24 小时内扣款,扣款成功后订阅周期自动顺延响应周期。 4. 隐私政策:https://docs.qq.com/doc/p/51274efe5d986b4288fbf4c6849272d2b6c66b8b 5. 服务协议:https://docs.qq.com/doc/p/dfb67b458d9800bdb3df1990068e510961f08c6c

About

百家牌记分器

Features
Read full description

【百算无漏 · 秒清算】 深化“记分器”的专业性: 告别心算笔算的误差和拖延。内置智能算法,支持复杂规则(如番型、奖分、扣底),一键快速结算。游戏结束瞬间,公平精准的战报即刻生成,让“扯皮”无从谈起。 场景口号: “结束即结算,胜负0延迟。”

Screenshots

好运记牌器2 screens
百家牌记分器3 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is in-app purchases: 百家牌记分器 at none against 好运记牌器's 3. 百家牌记分器 also leads on device support. On price and iOS requirement there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. 好运记牌器 sells 3 in-app purchases, starting at $4.99 per 7 days. 百家牌记分器 asks for nothing beyond the download.

Scorecard2 real differences · 3 level
好运记牌器 versus 百家牌记分器: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parameter好运记牌器百家牌记分器
PriceFreeFree
Ads—No
In-app purchasesYesNo — better
Devices—iPhone, iPod — better
Requires iOS14.014.0
Further details — not scored
Size61 MB5 MB
Age rating4+17+
Developer晓琦 徐Wuhan Zhihejia Technology Co., Ltd.

In-app purchases

3 purchases

好运记牌器

Subscriptions3
  • 高级会员$4.997 Days
  • 高级会员$12.991 Month
  • 高级会员$79.991 Year
None

百家牌记分器

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is 好运记牌器 free?
好运记牌器 is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Is 百家牌记分器 free?
百家牌记分器 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

Other comparisons