Appwe vs 途播
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
Appwe
Easily install apps on your smart TV by adjusting ADB settings and entering an app code. Share your favorite smart TV apps with friends by uploading them to a website and generating a shareable code.
- Smart TV app installation
- ADB settings guidance
- App code input
- App sharing via website
- Generate shareable codes
Read full descriptionHide full description
If users want to install an app on their smart TV, they only need to open Yecao Helper, and Yecao Helper will guide the user to adjust the TV ADB settings. After the setting is completed, the user enters the code of the app they want to install and clicks Confirm to automatically install the app corresponding to the code to the smart TV. If the user wants to share the smart TV app with friends, they can visit the website (yecao.net) to upload the app. After the upload is completed, they will get a new code and just share the code with their friends.
途播
This is a straightforward IPTV player that allows you to import and organize your own playlists. It offers quick browsing and playback of live channels with features like channel preview and hardware decoding.
- Supports M3U, M3U8, and TXT playlists
- Import playlists via URL or local files
- Automatic channel name and group parsing
- Channel search, categorization, and favorites
- Channel preview
- System hardware decoding priority
- Dark interface
Read full descriptionHide full description
途播是一款简洁易用的 IPTV 播放器，支持导入和管理你自己的播放列表，快速浏览和播放直播频道。 主要功能： • 支持 M3U、M3U8 和 TXT 播放列表 • 支持通过网址或本地文件导入 • 自动解析频道名称与分组 • 支持频道搜索、分类和收藏 • 频道画面预览 • 系统硬件解码优先 • 支持横屏自动全屏播放 • 简洁直观的深色界面 途播不提供、托管或销售任何频道、节目源及媒体内容。用户应仅导入自己拥有合法访问和使用权限的播放列表，并对所播放内容承担相应责任。 官方网站：https://tubo.pw 联系邮箱：support@tubo.pw
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is ads: Appwe at none against 途播's shown. Appwe also leads on rating (4.8 vs 4.5) and ratings volume (76 vs 19). 途播's advantage is update cadence (every 2 days vs every 2 months) and review sentiment (76% vs 55%). On price, in-app purchases and monetization model there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Appwe sells 3 one-off in-app purchases and 途播 sells 1 one-off in-app purchase. Whichever you choose, the download price is not the number that matters.
Appwe holds the better App Store score, 4.8 against 4.5. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 76 and 19 respectively. Written reviews complicate that: 55% of Appwe's written reviews are positive against 76% of 途播's, so the app with the better star average is not the one people write more warmly about.
Appwe ships an update every 2 months, 途播 every 2 days. The most recent releases landed on October 13, 2026 and October 12, 2026 respectively.
| Parameter | Appwe | 途播 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | 4.8 (76 ratings) — better | 4.5 (19 ratings) |
| Positive reviews | 54.5% of reviews | 75.7% of reviews — better |
| Number of ratings | 76 — better | 19 |
| Update frequency | Every 2 months | Every 2 days — better |
| Ads | No — better | Yes |
| In-app purchases | Yes | Yes |
| Monetization | Free with in-app purchases | Free with in-app purchases |
| Devices | iPhone, iPod | iPhone, iPad, Mac, Apple TV, Apple Watch — better |
| Requires iOS | 15.0 — better | 17.0 |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 22 MB | 127 MB |
| Age rating | 4+ | 9+ |
| Developer | 北京汗粮科技有限公司 | 帅 李 |
Customer experience
Appwe
途播
In-app purchases
Appwe
- 下载加速卡 30 天$0.99
- 下载加速卡 24小时$0.99
- VIP 会员 30 天$9.99
途播
- 途播 Pro 终身版$4.99
