Comparison

智体跳一跳 vs PerformanceX

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

智体跳一跳

Features
Read full description

与蹦床运动器材进行连接,将蹦床运动智能化数据化,内容包括早教互动学习、减肥健身运动、体感蹦床游戏三大功能。

About

PerformanceX

This app uses advanced video analysis and biomechanical algorithms to provide precise jump performance testing and data analysis for athletes and coaches. It offers various jump tests, strength-speed relationship analysis, and functional strength assessments, with detailed biomechanical parameter calculations.

Highlights
  • Vertical jump testing (CMJ, SJ, DJ)
  • Strength-speed relationship analysis
  • Functional strength testing (Nordic Hamstring)
  • Automatic biomechanical parameter calculation
  • Video analysis with high frame rate support
  • Athlete and team data management
  • CSV data export
Read full description

PerformanceX是一款专为运动员、教练员和体育科研人员设计的专业运动表现分析应用。通过先进的视频分析技术和生物力学计算算法,为您提供精准的跳跃能力测试和数据分析。 - 垂直跳跃测试系列: CMJ(反向跳) — 经典的反向跳跃测试,评估运动员的下肢爆发力和牵张-缩短循环能力 SJ(蹲跳) — 无反向移动的跳跃测试,精准评估纯力量输出能力 Abalakov(摆臂反向跳) — 允许摆臂的反向跳跃测试,全面评估上下肢协调发力能力 DJ(落体跳) — 从一定高度跳下后立即向上跳跃,评估反应力量和弹性能力 RSImodify(修正反应强度指数) — 专门的反应力量评估测试,量化运动员的快速伸缩复合能力 单腿跳跃 — 单侧肢体力量评估,检测双侧力量不对称性 - 力量-速度关系分析: CMJ-FV(反向跳力量-速度关系) — 深入分析反向跳的力量-速度特征曲线 SJ-FV(蹲跳力量-速度关系) — 无反向移动状态下的力量-速度关系分析 - 水平跳跃与单侧测试: 立定跳远 — 水平跳跃距离测试,评估下肢水平爆发力 - 功能性力量测试: 北欧降(Nordic Hamstring) — 专业的腘绳肌离心力量测试,评估后链肌群力量,预防运动损伤 *自动计算多项生物力学参数: 飞行时间与跳跃高度 起飞速度与平均速度 力、功率与相对功率 冲量与加速度 做功距离等 *强大的数据管理 运动员档案管理 — 记录身高、体重、腿长等关键身体数据 队伍组织管理 — 轻松管理多个运动员和团队 历史数据追踪 — 长期监测训练进步 雷达图对比分析 — 直观比较不同测试结果 CSV数据导出 — 便于深入分析和报告制作 *专业的视频分析 支持240fps高帧率视频拍摄 支持导入已有视频 精确的关键帧提取(离地/落地瞬间) 直观的帧控制操作 【PerformanceX自动订阅服务说明】 订阅选项 提供以下自动续期订阅选项: 专业版月度套餐 专业版年度套餐 订阅内容 订阅后,您将获得以下专业功能: 完整跳跃力学分析数据 无限制的历史记录保存 高级数据对比分析 专业跳跃报告导出 无广告体验 所有价格均包含适用税费。价格可能因所在国家/地区、汇率波动或其他因素而异。我们保留随时调整订阅价格的权利,价格变更前将通知您。 服务条款:https://www.apple.com/legal/internet-services/itunes/dev/stdeula/ 用户协议:https://docs.qq.com/doc/DRGtwUWxwZkpodGJB?u=ee30bf6d33dc4a14b9a3832cd5aa15e5&no_promotion=1 隐私协议:https://docs.qq.com/doc/DRGRJT0hIemZVYnJz?u=ee30bf6d33dc4a14b9a3832cd5aa15e5&no_promotion=1

Screenshots

智体跳一跳4 screens
PerformanceX4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is in-app purchases: 智体跳一跳 at none against PerformanceX's 3. 智体跳一跳 also leads on iOS requirement (11.0 vs 16.0). PerformanceX's advantage is update cadence (monthly vs every 3 months). On price, ads and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. PerformanceX sells 3 in-app purchases, starting at $2.99 per month. 智体跳一跳 asks for nothing beyond the download.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

智体跳一跳 ships an update every 3 months, PerformanceX monthly. The most recent releases landed on October 13, 2026 and October 2, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard3 real differences · 4 level
智体跳一跳 versus PerformanceX: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parameter智体跳一跳PerformanceX
PriceFreeFree
Update frequencyEvery 3 monthsMonthly — better
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNo — betterYes
Monetization—Free with in-app purchases
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPod — betteriPhone, iPad
Requires iOS11.0 — better16.0
Further details — not scored
Size2.0 GB119 MB
Age rating4+4+
Developer有恒 任顽石运动智能科技(北京)有限公司

In-app purchases

None

智体跳一跳

No in-app purchases

3 purchases

PerformanceX

Subscriptions2
  • 月度会员7 Days trial$2.991 Month
  • 年度会员$24.991 Year
One-time1
  • 终身会员$59.99

Questions

Is 智体跳一跳 free?
智体跳一跳 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is PerformanceX free?
PerformanceX is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Do 智体跳一跳 or PerformanceX have ads?
Neither 智体跳一跳 nor PerformanceX shows ads.
Which is updated more often, 智体跳一跳 or PerformanceX?
智体跳一跳 ships an update every 3 months, and PerformanceX monthly. Most recently, 智体跳一跳 was updated on October 13, 2026 and PerformanceX on October 2, 2026.

Other comparisons