MECW vs BLE
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
MECW
Read full descriptionHide full description
多功能制暴器/MCEW App可以通过蓝牙与手机进行通讯，并将电击器内置的SD卡中的操作数据传输给App进行展示、筛选，并支持导出操作数据成excel到手机本地、支持多语言（中英文）
BLE
Read full descriptionHide full description
此 APP 是蓝牙应用，我们的客户在购买了 Queclink G3/ZK 系列的设备后，可以开启设备上的蓝牙扫描功能，然后客户手机下载此 APP，通过访问sql来登录账号，并用手机去连接扫描蓝牙配件，这样就可以去查询和配置iot设备的相关数据。所有数据均在蓝牙连接下操作，客户也可以选择将本地的日志通过ftp上传至服务器来排查问题。 由于此 APP 是配套应用，会使用 http，无加密需求，故没有使用 https，是正常的。
Screenshots
Verdict
MECW and BLE are too close to call on the numbers: across 5 compared parameters — price, ads, in-app purchases and device support among them — neither pulls far enough ahead to decide it. What separates them is feature set and interface, not measurable difference.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
| Parameter | MECW | BLE |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Update frequency | Daily | — |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Devices | iPhone, iPod | iPhone, iPod |
| Requires iOS | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 20 MB | 28 MB |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | Shenzhen Megmeet Electrical Co., Ltd. | Queclink Wireless Solutions Co.,Ltd |
In-app purchases
MECW
No in-app purchases
BLE
No in-app purchases
