MChatClient vs Hamkar
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side β with what reviewers say about each.
MChatClient
A secure and decentralized chat application built on the Matrix protocol. It offers real-time messaging, group chats, voice messages, and media sharing with end-to-end encryption for private conversations. The app provides a modern, intuitive interface for seamless cross-device communication.
- Decentralized Matrix-based communication
- End-to-end encryption
- Real-time messaging
- Group chats
- Voice messages
- Media sharing
Read full descriptionHide full description
Stay connected with friends, family, and teams using our secure and decentralized Matrix-based chat app. Enjoy real-time messaging, group chats, voice messages, and media sharing, all while maintaining complete control over your data. Built on the Matrix protocol, our app offers end-to-end encryption, ensuring your conversations are private and secure. Whether youβre chatting one-on-one or collaborating in groups, experience seamless communication across devices. Stay in sync with a modern, intuitive interface designed for fast, easy, and private messaging.
Hamkar
Read full descriptionHide full description
This application is a private messaging solution built on the open-source Element client and powered by the Matrix protocol. Created for internal organizational use, it provides secure, real-time communication for authorized members only. All conversations are end-to-end encrypted, ensuring privacy and protection of sensitive information. With support for one-to-one and group messaging, voice and video calling, file transfers, notifications, and full chat history, the app enables seamless collaboration in a closed and secure environment. Highlights: * Strong end-to-end encryption (Matrix / Olm) * Individual and group chat support * Voice and video calling support * File and media sharing * Sync across multiple devices * Purpose-built for internal organizational communication
Screenshots
Verdict
MChatClient and Hamkar are too close to call on the numbers: across 5 compared parameters β price, ads, in-app purchases and device support among them β neither pulls far enough ahead to decide it. What separates them is feature set and interface, not measurable difference.
Scored on Price Β· Rating Β· Positive reviews Β· Number of ratings Β· Update frequency Β· Ads Β· In-app purchases Β· Monetization Β· Best chart rank Β· Devices Β· Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
| Parameter | MChatClient | Hamkar |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Positive reviews | 0.0% of reviews | β |
| Update frequency | β | Every 4 months |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Monetization | Free | β |
| Devices | iPhone, iPod | iPhone, iPad, iPod β better |
| Requires iOS | 15.0 | 15.0 |
| Further details β not scored | ||
| Size | 130 MB | 129 MB |
| Age rating | 4+ | 17+ |
| Developer | Feride Emircan | Ihor Bondar |
In-app purchases
MChatClient
No in-app purchases
Hamkar
No in-app purchases









