Comparison

博时基金 vs 易方达e钱包

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

博时基金

Features
Read full description

欢迎加入博时,一起做“价值投资发现者”。博时基金管理有限公司成立于1998年7月13日,是中国内地首批成立的五家基金管理公司之一。截截至2025年12月31日,博时基金管理有限公司共管理403只公募基金,并受全国社会保障基金理事会委托管理部分社保基金,以及多个企业年金、职业年金及特定专户,管理资产总规模逾16746亿元人民币,剔除货币基金后,博时基金管理有限公司公募资产管理总规模逾6938亿元人民币,累计分红逾2258亿元人民币,是目前我国资产管理规模领先的基金公司之一。 数据来源:博时官网,2025年12月31日 博时基金APP,一站式基金理财平台 1、【搜索】:市场热点追踪 热销基金榜单 2、【我的自选】:优选好基推荐 行情动态追踪 3、【基金详情】:多维度数据 投资风向标 4、【大数据选基】:博时基金6大财富榜 5、【财富频道】:汇聚基金 稳健 高端

About

易方达e钱包

This app offers professional investment advisory services tailored to client needs, enhancing the investment experience. It provides over 130 investment strategies across four demand scenarios to meet diverse investment requirements. Enjoy zero-fee fund purchases.

Highlights
  • Professional investment advisory services
  • 130+ investment strategies
  • Four demand scenarios
  • Zero-fee fund purchases
  • Wealth management solutions
Read full description

易方达财富APP e钱包提供从机器投顾到专属顾问多层次投顾服务。机器投顾,低门槛、低费率,1000元起投,您在线填写简单问卷后,系统将自动为您匹配适合的策略,策略由专业投研团队管理、动态调仓,便捷、简单、省心。 随着您的资产规模增加,可解锁专属顾问服务。130+投顾策略覆盖多元需求场景,更有一对一专属顾问全程护航,持续提升您的投资体验。 关于易方达财富: 2025年7月成立,由易方达基金全资持股,注册资本1亿元人民币。 公司聚焦开展买方投资顾问服务,致力于探索投顾业务和财富管理的新模式、新业态。 公司组建了高水平的投资研究、顾问服务、系统开发、金融科技、风控管理、运营运作等全流程服务团队,为客户提供高质量的财富管理解决方案和服务。 公司逐步建立全市场基金产品的代销体系,为销售业务客户提供丰富的产品选择,为投资顾问业务构建全面坚实的业务保障。 联系我们: 官方网站:www.efundcf.com.cn 服务热线:400-160-8888 客服邮箱:wealth@efunds.com.cn

Screenshots

博时基金4 screens
易方达e钱包4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: 易方达e钱包 at 4.9 against 博时基金's 1.8. 易方达e钱包 also leads on ratings volume (118 vs 8) and review sentiment (94% vs 80%). On price, update cadence, ads and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

易方达e钱包 holds the better App Store score, 4.9 against 1.8. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: 易方达e钱包 has 118 ratings behind it against 8, so its average is the more settled of the two. Written reviews point the same way: 80% of 博时基金's written reviews are positive against 94% of 易方达e钱包's.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

博时基金 ships an update every 3 weeks, 易方达e钱包 monthly. Both last shipped on September 21, 2026.

Scorecard3 real differences · 7 level
博时基金 versus 易方达e钱包: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parameter博时基金易方达e钱包
PriceFreeFree
Rating1.8 (8 ratings)4.9 (118 ratings) — better
Positive reviews80.0% of reviews94.0% of reviews — better
Number of ratings8118 — better
Update frequencyEvery 3 weeks — betterMonthly
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
Monetization—Free with in-app purchases
DevicesiPhone, iPodiPhone, iPod
Requires iOS12.0 — better13.0
Further details — not scored
Size82 MB119 MB
Age rating17+4+
Developer博时基金管理有限公司易方达基金管理有限公司

Customer experience

博时基金

All ratings8 ratings
Positive12.5%
Neutral12.5%
Negative75.0%
Written reviews25 reviews
Positive80.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative20.0%

易方达e钱包

All ratings118 ratings
Positive97.5%
Neutral0.0%
Negative2.5%
Written reviews50 reviews
Positive94.0%
Neutral2.0%
Negative4.0%

In-app purchases

None

博时基金

No in-app purchases

None

易方达e钱包

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is 博时基金 free?
博时基金 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is 易方达e钱包 free?
易方达e钱包 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, 博时基金 or 易方达e钱包?
易方达e钱包 is rated higher. 博时基金 averages 1.8 out of 5 from 8 ratings, while 易方达e钱包 averages 4.9 from 118 ratings.
Do 博时基金 or 易方达e钱包 have ads?
Neither 博时基金 nor 易方达e钱包 shows ads.
Which is updated more often, 博时基金 or 易方达e钱包?
博时基金 ships an update every 3 weeks, and 易方达e钱包 monthly. Most recently, 博时基金 was updated on September 21, 2026 and 易方达e钱包 on September 21, 2026.

Other comparisons