Comparison

amoenus externus vs WEAR Texture Processor

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side β€” with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

amoenus externus

Features
Read full description

amoenus externus transforms your headphone listening into a natural speaker experience. Using a carefully tuned arrangement of 9 ultra-short delays, it recreates the acoustic perception of a classic stereo speaker triangle β€” placing the sound naturally in front of you, slightly outside your head, rather than inside it. No artificial reverb. No coloration. Just a more natural, fatigue-free headphone sound. Compatible with foobar2000 (v2.25+), AUM, GarageBand, and all AUv3-compatible hosts on iOS.

About

WEAR Texture Processor

Currently charting
Read full description

WEAR is an AUv3 texture processor designed for making audio feel uncertain. WEAR makes no sound on its ownβ€”it is an audio effect designed to be loaded inside a compatible AUv3 host. Place it after pianos, guitars, vocals, drums, synthesizers, field recordings, or other audio sources to introduce filtered, warbled movement and texture. Built around instability, movement, and degradation, WEAR reshapes incoming audio through a collection of processes designed to add character. RATE and DEPTH introduce pitch modulation. GATE responds dynamically to the incoming signal, allowing quieter material to become increasingly unstable while louder sounds push through. FILTER reshapes the frequency range, while GRIME, WASH, and ROOM introduce different forms of texture, space, and degradation. The result can range from subtle movement to extreme transformation depending on what you dial in. WEAR intentionally includes no presets. Its behavior depends heavily on the material being passed through it, so it is designed to be adjusted by ear for each sound rather than treated as a collection of fixed effects. Exploration is encouraged.

Screenshots

amoenus externus4 screens
WEAR Texture Processor1 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is chart position: WEAR Texture Processor at #176 against amoenus externus's unranked. amoenus externus's advantage is iOS requirement (12.0 vs 15.0). On price, ads, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price Β· Rating Β· Positive reviews Β· Number of ratings Β· Update frequency Β· Ads Β· In-app purchases Β· Monetization Β· Best chart rank Β· Devices Β· Requires iOS

CostPrice Β· In-app purchases Β· Ads Β· Monetization

amoenus externus costs $2.99 and WEAR Texture Processor $2.99 up front. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

Scorecard2 real differences Β· 5 level
amoenus externus versus WEAR Texture Processor: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parameteramoenus externusWEAR Texture Processor
Price$2.99$2.99
Update frequencyFortnightlyβ€”
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
Best chart rankβ€”#176 β€” better
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod
Requires iOS12.0 β€” better15.0
Further details β€” not scored
Size8 MB8 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperErich MeierField Tone Audio, LLC

In-app purchases

None

amoenus externus

No in-app purchases

None

WEAR Texture Processor

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is amoenus externus free?
amoenus externus costs $2.99, with no in-app purchases.
Is WEAR Texture Processor free?
WEAR Texture Processor costs $2.99, with no in-app purchases.
Do amoenus externus or WEAR Texture Processor have ads?
Neither amoenus externus nor WEAR Texture Processor shows ads.

Other comparisons