amoenus externus vs WEAR Texture Processor
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side β with what reviewers say about each.
amoenus externus
Read full descriptionHide full description
amoenus externus transforms your headphone listening into a natural speaker experience. Using a carefully tuned arrangement of 9 ultra-short delays, it recreates the acoustic perception of a classic stereo speaker triangle β placing the sound naturally in front of you, slightly outside your head, rather than inside it. No artificial reverb. No coloration. Just a more natural, fatigue-free headphone sound. Compatible with foobar2000 (v2.25+), AUM, GarageBand, and all AUv3-compatible hosts on iOS.
WEAR Texture Processor
Read full descriptionHide full description
WEAR is an AUv3 texture processor designed for making audio feel uncertain. WEAR makes no sound on its ownβit is an audio effect designed to be loaded inside a compatible AUv3 host. Place it after pianos, guitars, vocals, drums, synthesizers, field recordings, or other audio sources to introduce filtered, warbled movement and texture. Built around instability, movement, and degradation, WEAR reshapes incoming audio through a collection of processes designed to add character. RATE and DEPTH introduce pitch modulation. GATE responds dynamically to the incoming signal, allowing quieter material to become increasingly unstable while louder sounds push through. FILTER reshapes the frequency range, while GRIME, WASH, and ROOM introduce different forms of texture, space, and degradation. The result can range from subtle movement to extreme transformation depending on what you dial in. WEAR intentionally includes no presets. Its behavior depends heavily on the material being passed through it, so it is designed to be adjusted by ear for each sound rather than treated as a collection of fixed effects. Exploration is encouraged.
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is chart position: WEAR Texture Processor at #176 against amoenus externus's unranked. amoenus externus's advantage is iOS requirement (12.0 vs 15.0). On price, ads, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price Β· Rating Β· Positive reviews Β· Number of ratings Β· Update frequency Β· Ads Β· In-app purchases Β· Monetization Β· Best chart rank Β· Devices Β· Requires iOS
amoenus externus costs $2.99 and WEAR Texture Processor $2.99 up front. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
| Parameter | amoenus externus | WEAR Texture Processor |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2.99 | $2.99 |
| Update frequency | Fortnightly | β |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Best chart rank | β | #176 β better |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad, iPod | iPhone, iPad, iPod |
| Requires iOS | 12.0 β better | 15.0 |
| Further details β not scored | ||
| Size | 8 MB | 8 MB |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | Erich Meier | Field Tone Audio, LLC |
In-app purchases
amoenus externus
No in-app purchases
WEAR Texture Processor
No in-app purchases
Questions
Is amoenus externus free?
Is WEAR Texture Processor free?
Do amoenus externus or WEAR Texture Processor have ads?
Other comparisons















