Comparison

XRayClient vs HyperOrbit

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

XRayClient

This app provides secure and reliable internet access using modern XRay servers. It supports popular protocols like VLESS, VMess, Trojan, and Shadowsocks, making it ideal for users prioritizing security, stability, and online freedom.

Highlights
  • Secure internet access
  • Modern XRay servers
  • VLESS protocol support
  • VMess protocol support
  • Trojan protocol support
  • Shadowsocks protocol support
Read full description

XRayClient is a user-friendly and reliable app for secure internet access. Leverage modern XRay servers to protect your data. Support for popular protocols: VLESS, VMess, Trojan, Shadowsocks. Perfect for anyone who values security, stability, and internet freedom.

About

HyperOrbit

This app provides a fast, secure, and stable proxy experience with a custom-built engine. It offers one-tap connection, smart routing, and detailed connection insights. Supports multiple protocols and seamless iCloud sync across devices.

Highlights
  • One-Tap Connect
  • HyperCore Engine
  • Smart Routing
  • Live Connection Dashboard
  • Latency Testing
  • Subscription Management
  • iCloud Sync
Features
Read full description

HyperOrbit is powered by our in-house HyperCore engine, delivering a blazing-fast, secure, and stable proxy experience. —— Full Protocol Coverage —— • VLESS (with Reality/Vision) • VMess • Shadowsocks/ShadowsocksR • Trojan • AnyTLS • Hysteria2 • TUIC • WireGuard • AmneziaWG Whatever protocol you need, HyperOrbit has you covered. —— Core Features —— • One-Tap Connect — Instant protection, no complex setup • HyperCore Engine — Custom-built core for maximum speed and minimal memory usage • Smart Routing — Direct for domestic, proxy for overseas — automatically picks the best path • Live Connection Dashboard — Active connections, traffic stats, and DNS queries at a glance • Latency Testing — Real TCP handshake measurements to find the fastest node • Subscription Management — Import via URL, QR code, or clipboard with auto-update; batch import/export WireGuard .conf files • iCloud Sync — Seamlessly sync configs, nodes, and settings across devices • Data Management — Clear logs, delete connection records, one-tap reset • Scene Switching — Auto-switch nodes, modes, and rules based on Wi-Fi/Cellular network • Route Analysis — Understand how your current routing rules are working —— Multi-Platform —— • Native iPhone/iPad support • Mac (Designed for iPad) — TUN mode and SOCKS5 proxy mode • Custom SOCKS5 proxy port for browsers and terminals —— Privacy & Security —— • Strict no-log policy — no tracking, no data collection • Full control over local data — clear anytime —— Why HyperOrbit? —— Our in-house HyperCore engine processes traffic directly with no middleware, resulting in lower latency and less resource usage — perfectly optimized for iOS/macOS devices. New users get a 7-day free trial, no credit card required. Terms of Use (EULA): https://www.apple.com/legal/internet-services/itunes/dev/stgula/

Screenshots

XRayClient3 screens
HyperOrbit4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: XRayClient at 5.0 against HyperOrbit's 4.0. XRayClient also leads on in-app purchases (none vs 3). HyperOrbit's advantage is ratings volume (4 vs 1). On price, ads, monetization model and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. HyperOrbit sells 3 in-app purchases, starting at $0.99 per month. XRayClient asks for nothing beyond the download.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

XRayClient holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 4.0. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 1 and 4 respectively.

Scorecard3 real differences · 7 level
XRayClient versus HyperOrbit: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterXRayClientHyperOrbit
PriceFreeFree
Rating5.0 (1 ratings) — better4.0 (4 ratings)
Positive reviews—100.0% of reviews
Number of ratings14 — better
Update frequency—Weekly
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNo — betterYes
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhone, iPadiPhone, iPad, Apple TV — better
Requires iOS16.016.0
Further details — not scored
Size57 MB88 MB
Age rating17+4+
DeveloperMAKING-APP, TOOMINDSAFE TECH LLC

In-app purchases

None

XRayClient

No in-app purchases

3 purchases

HyperOrbit

Subscriptions2
  • Plus (Monthly)3 Days trial$0.991 Month
  • Plus (Yearly)3 Days trial$1.991 Year
One-time1
  • Plus Lifetime$9.99

Questions

Is XRayClient free?
XRayClient is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is HyperOrbit free?
HyperOrbit is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Which has better reviews, XRayClient or HyperOrbit?
XRayClient is rated higher. XRayClient averages 5.0 out of 5 from 1 ratings, while HyperOrbit averages 4.0 from 4 ratings.
Do XRayClient or HyperOrbit have ads?
Neither XRayClient nor HyperOrbit shows ads.

Other comparisons