RiskTrack vs CameraSpotter
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
RiskTrack
This app provides real-time alerts and detailed analyses to help users stay informed about potential risks and make safer decisions. It features a user-friendly interface, customizable tools, and collaborative sharing for enhanced safety and efficiency.
- Real-time alerts
- Secure system
- Intuitive interface
- Cross-platform compatibility
- Customizable tools
- Collaborative sharing
Read full descriptionHide full description
RiskTrack is your go-to platform for staying informed about potential risks and ensuring your safety with real-time updates. Our user-friendly app delivers instant alerts, detailed analyses, and collaborative tools to help you make safer decisions anytime, anywhere. Key Features: Real-Time Alerts: Stay ahead of potential risks with instant, accurate updates. Secure System: Built with the latest standards to ensure your data's safety and reliability. Intuitive Interface: Easy to navigate, designed for quick access to crucial safety information. Cross-Platform Compatibility: Optimized for mobile, desktop, and all major browsers. Customizable Tools: Tailor your notifications and reports for enhanced safety and efficiency. Collaborative Sharing: Share risk assessments and alerts with your network instantly. Why Choose RiskTrack? With RiskTrack, you’ll always stay one step ahead of security threats. Our visually appealing, high-resolution alerts and seamless design offer a superior user experience, enabling you to access vital safety information without any hassle. Download Now Take control of your safety today. Install RiskTrack on your mobile devices and experience the peace of mind that comes with staying informed and secure. For more details, visit our website or contact our support team.
CameraSpotter
Read full descriptionHide full description
The Start Making Sense project (2025–2027) by the Leiden-Delft-Erasmus Centre for BOLD Cities examines the presence and use of surveillance cameras in the public domain, as subjects of democratic decision-making and public debate, rather than as neutral or inevitable tools. While it is often assumed that cities have a camera technology register for public use in place, the reality is very different. There are hardly any up-to-date registers, let alone ones that are public and that specify where and why cameras owned by whom are used. Moreover, many smart city surveillance camera’s operate either invisibly or "hide in plain sight", blending into the fabric of everyday urban life and thus giving little reason for reflection or contestation. On top of this, government transparency regarding the presence, function, and implications of these camera’s, the data they generate, and how they use, implement and distribute it, is largely lacking. Regulatory shortcomings, technical barriers, limited political and societal urgency, and siloed governance structures further hinder public insight and collaborative responses. This means that many questions remain unasked, let alone answered. For example, what problems are these cameras solving? Which new problems do they create? Who has (not) given permission to use this technology? Who owns the data? How do local government agencies or the police use the data to make (real-time) decisions and interventions? Is camera data linked to other types of data? Who benefits from this technology? Who might be (further) harmed or repressed by these cameras? How and where can people object to this technology being used on them? And what are the alternatives? As an intervention, the aim of this app is to create a public camera register for and by the people of Rotterdam. Based on citizen science, this initiative maps where, why, and by whom cameras are used. By doing so, we are fostering transparency, awareness, and civic dialogue and debate about surveillance. We focus on Rotterdam, because on the one hand it is known for its strong security focus (and hence political love for surveillance camera’s), and on the other hand it is the only major Dutch city without even a first attempt for a public camera register. This makes it an urgent and fitting location to explore how surveillance technologies can be made visible, contestable, and democratically accountable. The CameraSpotter App is running on the SPOTTERON Citizen Science Platform at www.spotteron.net
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is update cadence: RiskTrack at every 2 weeks against CameraSpotter's every 2 months. CameraSpotter's advantage is iOS requirement (12.0 vs 15.6). On price, ads, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
RiskTrack ships an update every 2 weeks, CameraSpotter every 2 months. The most recent releases landed on October 30, 2026 and October 7, 2026 respectively.
| Parameter | RiskTrack | CameraSpotter |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | 4.0 (1 ratings) — better | — |
| Number of ratings | 1 — better | — |
| Update frequency | Every 2 weeks — better | Every 2 months |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Monetization | Free | — |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad, iPod | iPhone, iPad, iPod |
| Requires iOS | 15.6 | 12.0 — better |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 137 MB | 59 MB |
| Age rating | 4+ | 17+ |
| Developer | Techeir IT Services Limited | SPOTTERON Gmbh |
In-app purchases
RiskTrack
No in-app purchases
CameraSpotter
No in-app purchases







