Comparison

EDA vs ShifthandleNext

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

EDA

Features
Read full description

EDA-Time Tracker ist eine innovative Lösung zur Zeiterfassung, die speziell für den internen Einsatz in Unternehmen entwickelt wurde. Mit NFC-Technologie können Mitarbeiter ihre Arbeitszeiten ganz einfach per Tap erfassen, was eine genaue und effiziente Zeiterfassung ermöglicht. Mit seiner benutzerfreundlichen Oberfläche eliminiert EDA-Time Tracker die Notwendigkeit manueller Zeiterfassung und steigert die Produktivität, indem es Managern und HR-Teams Echtzeitdaten zur Verfügung stellt. Hauptmerkmale: • NFC-basierte Zeiterfassung für schnelle und einfache Registrierung • Sicherer, interner Einsatz, speziell für Unternehmensmitarbeiter entwickelt • Echtzeit-Tracking und Berichterstattung von Arbeitszeiten • Anpassbar an Unternehmensrichtlinien und Arbeitsabläufe • Vollständig DSGVO-konform und garantiert Datenschutz und Datensicherheit EDA-Time Tracker ist die ideale Lösung für Unternehmen, die eine moderne, zuverlässige und sichere Methode zur Zeiterfassung ihrer Mitarbeiter suchen.

About

ShifthandleNext

Features
Read full description

The ShiftHandle App transforms your device into a portable time-tracking tool, allowing employees to easily clock in and out of assigned jobs from anywhere. As part of the ShiftHandle platform, the iOS app enables reliable time logging for remote locations and off-site work environments, ensuring accurate attendance tracking beyond the workplace. The app allows users to punch in and out with ease. Each entry is securely recorded with the device’s geo-location and a photo capture for verification. Employees can also view their complete punch history, whether recorded through the app, other connected devices, or the web platform.

Screenshots

EDA3 screens
ShifthandleNext4 screens

Verdict

The call

EDA and ShifthandleNext are too close to call on the numbers: across 6 compared parameters — price, update cadence, ads and in-app purchases among them — neither pulls far enough ahead to decide it. What separates them is feature set and interface, not measurable difference.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

EDA ships an update every 2 weeks, ShifthandleNext fortnightly. The most recent releases landed on September 6, 2026 and September 2, 2026 respectively.

ScorecardNo meaningful differences
EDA versus ShifthandleNext: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterEDAShifthandleNext
PriceFreeFree
Update frequencyEvery 2 weeksFortnightly — better
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
DevicesiPhone, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod — better
Requires iOS15.115.0 — better
Further details — not scored
Size33 MB61 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperPackteam24.de Power GmbHPrettyNeat

In-app purchases

None

EDA

No in-app purchases

None

ShifthandleNext

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is EDA free?
EDA is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is ShifthandleNext free?
ShifthandleNext is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Do EDA or ShifthandleNext have ads?
Neither EDA nor ShifthandleNext shows ads.
Which is updated more often, EDA or ShifthandleNext?
EDA ships an update every 2 weeks, and ShifthandleNext fortnightly. Most recently, EDA was updated on September 6, 2026 and ShifthandleNext on September 2, 2026.

Other comparisons