Comparison

Bipy vs EDA

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Bipy

Read full description

Manage your employees' attendance easily and efficiently with Bipy! The app that transforms your workplace into a modern, high-tech environment using NFC tags for attendance tracking. Key features: - Attendance recording using NFC tags: Employees will be able to clock in and out simply by bringing their smartphone close to the NFC tag placed in the workplace. - Ease of use: Bipy is designed to be easy and intuitive, allowing employees to record their attendance in seconds, without having to interact with complicated interfaces. - Real-time access: Monitor your employees' attendance wherever you are with real-time access to timekeeping data directly from your smartphone or computer. - Detailed reports: Get comprehensive and detailed reports on your employees' attendance and hours worked, making it easier to manage staff and human resources. - Security and transparency: Bipy ensures the security of sensitive data, protecting your employees' information and ensuring maximum transparency in time clock management. - Perfect for every type of company: Bipy is ideal for both small and large companies, adapting to the different needs of personnel organization and management. Don't miss the opportunity to make your work environment more efficient and innovative! Download Bipy now and discover all the advantages this solution can offer your company.

About

EDA

Features
Read full description

EDA-Time Tracker ist eine innovative Lösung zur Zeiterfassung, die speziell für den internen Einsatz in Unternehmen entwickelt wurde. Mit NFC-Technologie können Mitarbeiter ihre Arbeitszeiten ganz einfach per Tap erfassen, was eine genaue und effiziente Zeiterfassung ermöglicht. Mit seiner benutzerfreundlichen Oberfläche eliminiert EDA-Time Tracker die Notwendigkeit manueller Zeiterfassung und steigert die Produktivität, indem es Managern und HR-Teams Echtzeitdaten zur Verfügung stellt. Hauptmerkmale: • NFC-basierte Zeiterfassung für schnelle und einfache Registrierung • Sicherer, interner Einsatz, speziell für Unternehmensmitarbeiter entwickelt • Echtzeit-Tracking und Berichterstattung von Arbeitszeiten • Anpassbar an Unternehmensrichtlinien und Arbeitsabläufe • Vollständig DSGVO-konform und garantiert Datenschutz und Datensicherheit EDA-Time Tracker ist die ideale Lösung für Unternehmen, die eine moderne, zuverlässige und sichere Methode zur Zeiterfassung ihrer Mitarbeiter suchen.

Screenshots

Bipy4 screens
EDA3 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is iOS requirement: Bipy at 13.0 against EDA's 15.1. On price, update cadence, ads and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

Bipy ships an update fortnightly, EDA every 2 weeks. Both last shipped on October 7, 2026.

Scorecard1 real difference · 5 level
Bipy versus EDA: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterBipyEDA
PriceFreeFree
Update frequencyFortnightly — betterEvery 2 weeks
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPod — betteriPhone, iPod
Requires iOS13.0 — better15.1
Further details — not scored
Size29 MB33 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperOne AMPackteam24.de Power GmbH

In-app purchases

None

Bipy

No in-app purchases

None

EDA

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is Bipy free?
Bipy is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is EDA free?
EDA is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Do Bipy or EDA have ads?
Neither Bipy nor EDA shows ads.
Which is updated more often, Bipy or EDA?
Bipy ships an update fortnightly, and EDA every 2 weeks. Most recently, Bipy was updated on October 7, 2026 and EDA on October 7, 2026.

Other comparisons