Able to Use vs FAD
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
Able to Use
Read full descriptionHide full description
Control your Able automated gates and garage doors from your mobile device, with just one touch and from one single dashboard. ‘Able to Use’ is the app for managing home and building automations. Gates and garage doors can be remotely monitored and controlled with a single click, ensuring maximum convenience and efficiency. Access policies and times for additional users can be fully customized, and all activity can be tracked through detailed logs. Adding new users and installations is simple with QR code technology, providing a fast and intuitive user experience. Thanks to the geolocation function, each automated device can be set to one of three opening modes: manual, automatic, or semi-automatic, for a fully personalized experience. Your smart home devices connect effortlessly to the Wi-Fi domestic network through a dedicated Wi-Fi plug-in module, compatible with Able digital control units, for a complete, efficient, and connected home management solution.
FAD
Read full descriptionHide full description
FAD-App è l’app ufficiale di Meccanica Fadini S.r.l., progettata per rendere la gestione della barriera automatica FAD semplice, rapida e personalizzata. Collegandosi via Bluetooth al modulo FAD-Led Controller, l’app consente di: - Impostare e modificare i parametri di funzionamento della barriera; - Gestire i colori LED e gli effetti luminosi in base allo stato (aperta, chiusa, in movimento); - Controllare l’apertura e la chiusura direttamente dallo smartphone; Tutto avviene in locale, senza connessione internet, garantendo massima sicurezza e affidabilità. FAD-App trasforma la configurazione delle barriere FAD in un’esperienza pratica e professionale, pensata per installatori e tecnici che vogliono il pieno controllo a portata di mano.
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is device support: FAD at 3 against Able to Use's 1. On price, ads, in-app purchases and iOS requirement there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
| Parameter | Able to Use | FAD |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Update frequency | Every 6 weeks | — |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Devices | iPhone | iPhone, iPad, iPod — better |
| Requires iOS | 16.0 | 15.1 — better |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 21 MB | 55 MB |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | V2 S.p.a. | Meccanica Fadini S.r.l. |
In-app purchases
Able to Use
No in-app purchases
FAD
No in-app purchases





