Mud.bash vs zHttpClient
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side โ with what reviewers say about each.
Mud.bash
Read full descriptionHide full description
Your Band, Your World! Unite devices with a band! * A simple tailscale-like tool. * Extremely secure. Wireguard-based protocol. * Zero configuration required to set up the mesh network. * P2P (peer to peer) connection to each others. Can't talk each others due to the NAT type or the network firewall? We provides a proxy. * Link all your devices with a simple way. * Play LAN games with your friends. * Unlimited no. of users and devices. * Can't trust us? Mud.band is the open source project. You can verify with the source code and build your binary from the scratch: https://github.com/mud-band/mud.band-client
zHttpClient
Read full descriptionHide full description
zHttpClient is a simple HTTP client built on libcurl. It lets you edit URL, headers, query parameters and body, then send the request and see the raw response.
Screenshots
Verdict
Mud.bash and zHttpClient are too close to call on the numbers: across 5 compared parameters โ price, ads, in-app purchases and device support among them โ neither pulls far enough ahead to decide it. What separates them is feature set and interface, not measurable difference.
Scored on Price ยท Rating ยท Positive reviews ยท Number of ratings ยท Update frequency ยท Ads ยท In-app purchases ยท Monetization ยท Best chart rank ยท Devices ยท Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
| Parameter | Mud.bash | zHttpClient |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Update frequency | Weekly | โ |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad | iPhone, iPod |
| Requires iOS | 16.6 | 15.0 โ better |
| Further details โ not scored | ||
| Size | 6 MB | 28 MB |
| Age rating | 4+ | 17+ |
| Developer | Mudfish Networks Inc. | ่ตทๅ ด ้ฉ |
In-app purchases
Mud.bash
No in-app purchases
zHttpClient
No in-app purchases
