Comparison

BUBBO! vs BobaLovin

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both games, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

BUBBO!

Control charming characters by tilting or touching your device. Enjoy a relaxing experience with simple, intuitive gameplay. Discover unique characters and unwind with this engaging game.

Highlights
  • Tilt or touch controls
  • Character collection
  • Relaxing gameplay
  • Intuitive interface
  • Unique characters
Features
Read full description

Check out these characters! Tilt or touch the device to control them.

About

BobaLovin

Features
Read full description

New global version, welcome everyone to download and play!

Screenshots

BUBBO!1 screens
BobaLovin4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is ads: BUBBO! at none against BobaLovin's shown. On price, in-app purchases, device support and iOS requirement there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

Scorecard1 real difference · 8 level
BUBBO! versus BobaLovin: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterBUBBO!BobaLovin
PriceFreeFree
Rating5.0 (7 ratings) — better—
Positive reviews100.0% of reviews—
Number of ratings7 — better—
AdsNo — betterYes
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFree—
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod
Requires iOS13.012.0 — better
Further details — not scored
Size153 MB120 MB
Age rating12+4+
DeveloperThomas Willoughby鹭 刘

In-app purchases

None

BUBBO!

No in-app purchases

None

BobaLovin

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is BUBBO! free?
BUBBO! is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is BobaLovin free?
BobaLovin is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Do BUBBO! or BobaLovin have ads?
BobaLovin shows ads; BUBBO! does not.

Other comparisons