Maybe Maple vs Aquod
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
Maybe Maple
Identify maple trees using your phone's camera and AI. This app helps distinguish maple trees from similar species in the field. It's designed for quick and accurate identification.
- AI-powered tree identification
- Uses phone camera
- Field-tested accuracy
- Maple tree specific
- Easy to use interface
Read full descriptionHide full description
The Acer genus is home to some of the most recognizable trees in North America. But out in the field, under a leafy canopy, even the most seasoned eye can start to wonder: Is that actually a maple… or something else entirely? Introducing Maybe Maple — the app that uses your phone’s camera and a dash of AI magic to help answer one vital question: Is this a maple?
Aquod
This app streamlines wetland delineation by replacing paper forms with a digital workflow. It allows for offline data entry, auto-calculation of key tests, and generation of official PDF reports. Includes extensive plant and soil databases for accurate field assessments.
- Offline field data entry
- Project and plot management
- Automated dominance and prevalence index calculations
- Hydric soil indicator suggestions
- Generates official USACE PDF reports
- Extensive plant and soil databases
- Data export via share sheet
Read full descriptionHide full description
Aquod is a field data entry app for completing the USACE Northcentral and Northeast Region Wetland Determination Data Form (Version 2.0). Built by a Professional Wetland Scientist for wetland professionals on a budget! It replaces paper forms with a structured digital workflow that works entirely offline - no account, no internet, no data leaving your device. WHAT AQUOD DOES - Create projects and add multiple sample plots per site - Enter field data across four tabs per plot: Hydrology, Vegetation, Soils, and Summary - Auto-calculates dominance test, prevalence index, and FAC-neutral test from entered vegetation data - Suggests hydric soil indicators (A1–F22) based on entered horizon data, evaluated against USDA NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils v9.2 (2025) - Flags warning indicators (A17, A18, S6, S8, F8, F10, F12, F19, F21, F22) that require field confirmation, landform context, or regional restriction verification before use - Generates a multi-page PDF that mirrors the official USACE NCNE v2.0 form layout, ready to attach to a Joint Permit Application or project report - Export via AirDrop, Files, email, or any share sheet destination PLANT DATABASE Primary: 2,860-species NCNE National Wetland Plant List (USFWS, 2024 edition), with Great Lakes subregion adjustments. Fallback: 37,109-species USDA PLANTS database. Species not on the NCNE NWPL default to UPL. SOIL INDICATOR ENGINE Hydric soil indicator suggestions are evaluated against USDA NRCS v9.2 (2025) criteria, covering all applicable A, S, and F indicators for loamy, clayey, sandy, and organic textures. Indicators requiring visual confirmation, landform context, regional restriction, or confirmatory field tests are flagged with a warning rather than auto-checked. Tap any info button for full v9.2 criteria and field notes. FORM COVERAGE Full coverage of the NCNE v2.0 data form: project and site header, all hydrology primary and secondary indicators with depth fields, all four vegetation strata, all soil profile fields (up to 12 horizons with matrix and redox data), all standard and problematic hydric indicators, summary of findings, and final wetland determination. PRIVACY No backend. No account. No telemetry. All field data is stored locally in SQLite on your device and is never transmitted anywhere. The only data collected from Aquod is standard Apple App Store analytics — crash reports, performance diagnostics, and download counts — handled entirely by Apple's platform. Work completely offline with confidence that your data stays on your device. SCOPE & DISCLAIMER This version covers the USACE Northcentral and Northeast Region (NCNE) only. iOS only. For professional use by qualified wetland scientists. Aquod has not been reviewed, approved, or endorsed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, USDA NRCS, or any other federal or state agency, and no such review or approval has been sought or is implied. Aquod is a field data entry tool and does not replace professional judgment or constitute a formal wetland delineation. Aquod is not responsible or liable for the manner in which information is collected, stored, distributed, relied upon, or otherwise used by the user or any third party after it is exported from the app.
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is update cadence: Maybe Maple at every 5 days against Aquod's fortnightly. On price, rating, ratings volume and ads there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
On the App Store both sit at effectively the same score — 5.0 for Maybe Maple against 5.0 for Aquod. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 6 and 5 respectively.
Maybe Maple ships an update every 5 days, Aquod fortnightly. The most recent releases landed on September 10, 2026 and September 7, 2026 respectively.
| Parameter | Maybe Maple | Aquod |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | 5.0 (6 ratings) | 5.0 (5 ratings) |
| Positive reviews | 100.0% of reviews | — |
| Number of ratings | 6 — better | 5 |
| Update frequency | Every 5 days — better | Fortnightly |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Monetization | Free | Free |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad, iPod | iPhone, iPad, iPod |
| Requires iOS | 15.6 | 15.1 — better |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 32 MB | 33 MB |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | Ecobot, Inc. | Jason DeMoss |
Customer experience
Maybe Maple
Aquod
In-app purchases
Maybe Maple
No in-app purchases
Aquod
No in-app purchases









