Comparison

Maybe Maple vs Aquod

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Maybe Maple

Identify maple trees using your phone's camera and AI. This app helps distinguish maple trees from similar species in the field. It's designed for quick and accurate identification.

Highlights
  • AI-powered tree identification
  • Uses phone camera
  • Field-tested accuracy
  • Maple tree specific
  • Easy to use interface
Read full description

The Acer genus is home to some of the most recognizable trees in North America. But out in the field, under a leafy canopy, even the most seasoned eye can start to wonder: Is that actually a maple… or something else entirely? Introducing Maybe Maple — the app that uses your phone’s camera and a dash of AI magic to help answer one vital question: Is this a maple?

About

Aquod

This app streamlines wetland delineation by replacing paper forms with a digital workflow. It allows users to create projects, enter detailed field data, and automatically calculates key ecological indicators. The app generates official USACE forms and offers optional GPS-based data retrieval.

Highlights
  • Digital wetland delineation data entry
  • Offline-first structured workflow
  • Automatic calculation of ecological indicators
  • GPS-based site data retrieval
  • Generates official USACE PDF forms
  • Extensive plant and soil databases
Features
Read full description

Aquod is a field data entry app for completing the USACE Northcentral and Northeast Region Wetland Determination Data Form (Version 2.0). Built by a Professional Wetland Scientist for wetland professionals on a budget! It replaces paper forms with a structured digital workflow that is offline-first — no account required, and your field data never leaves your device. WHAT AQUOD DOES - Create projects and add multiple sample plots per site - Enter field data across four tabs per plot: Hydrology, Vegetation, Soils, and Summary - Edit or remove any saved soil horizon or vegetation species entry at any time — no need to delete and re-enter to make a correction - Auto-calculates dominance test, prevalence index, and FAC-neutral test from entered vegetation data - Suggests hydric soil indicators (A1–F22) based on entered horizon data, evaluated against USDA NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils v9.3 (2026) - Flags warning indicators (A17, A18, S6, S8, F8, F10, F12, F19, F21, F22) that require field confirmation, landform context, or regional restriction verification before use - Optionally pulls PLSS (Section/Township/Range), soil map unit, NWI classification, and MLRA from public federal data sources using your device's GPS — a quick starting point you review and correct, not a substitute for field verification - Generates a multi-page PDF that mirrors the official USACE NCNE v2.0 form layout, ready to attach to a Joint Permit Application or project report - Export via AirDrop, Files, email, or any share sheet destination PLANT DATABASE Primary: 2,860-species NCNE National Wetland Plant List (USFWS, 2024 edition), with Great Lakes subregion adjustments. Fallback: 37,109-species USDA PLANTS database. Species not on the NCNE NWPL default to UPL. SOIL INDICATOR ENGINE Hydric soil indicator suggestions are evaluated against USDA NRCS v9.3 (2026) criteria, covering all applicable A, S, and F indicators for loamy, clayey, sandy, and organic textures. Indicators requiring visual confirmation, landform context, regional restriction, or confirmatory field tests are flagged with a warning rather than auto-checked. Tap any info button for full v9.3 criteria and field notes. FORM COVERAGE Full coverage of the NCNE v2.0 data form: project and site header, all hydrology primary and secondary indicators with depth fields, all four vegetation strata, all soil profile fields (up to 12 horizons with matrix and redox data, each editable after saving), all standard and problematic hydric indicators, summary of findings, and final wetland determination. PRIVACY No backend, no account, no telemetry of your field data. All field data is stored locally in SQLite on your device and is never transmitted anywhere. The one exception is an optional "Pull Site Data" feature: when you explicitly tap it, the app sends only your GPS coordinates — never your field data — to public federal data services (BLM, USFWS, USDA) and a third-party host of an NRCS dataset for MLRA, to suggest values for your plot. The only other data collected from Aquod is standard Apple App Store analytics — crash reports, performance diagnostics, and download counts — handled entirely by Apple's platform. Your data stays on your device unless you choose to export or share it. SCOPE & DISCLAIMER This version covers the USACE Northcentral and Northeast Region (NCNE) only. iOS only. For professional use by qualified wetland scientists. Aquod has not been reviewed, approved, or endorsed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, USDA NRCS, or any other federal or state agency, and no such review or approval has been sought or is implied. Aquod is a field data entry tool and does not replace professional judgment or constitute a formal wetland delineation. Aquod is not responsible or liable for the manner in which information is collected, stored, distributed, relied upon, or otherwise used by the user or any third party after it is exported from the app.

Screenshots

Maybe Maple4 screens
Aquod4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is update cadence: Maybe Maple at every 5 days against Aquod's every 2 weeks. On price, rating, ratings volume and ads there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

On the App Store both sit at effectively the same score — 5.0 for Maybe Maple against 5.0 for Aquod. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 6 and 5 respectively.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

Maybe Maple ships an update every 5 days, Aquod every 2 weeks. The most recent releases landed on October 30, 2026 and November 9, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard1 real difference · 9 level
Maybe Maple versus Aquod: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterMaybe MapleAquod
PriceFreeFree
Rating5.0 (6 ratings)5.0 (5 ratings)
Positive reviews100.0% of reviews—
Number of ratings6 — better5
Update frequencyEvery 5 days — betterEvery 2 weeks
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod
Requires iOS15.615.1 — better
Further details — not scored
Size32 MB33 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperEcobot, Inc.Jason DeMoss

Customer experience

Maybe Maple

All ratings6 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%
Written reviews4 reviews
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

Aquod

All ratings5 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

None

Maybe Maple

No in-app purchases

None

Aquod

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is Maybe Maple free?
Maybe Maple is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is Aquod free?
Aquod is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, Maybe Maple or Aquod?
Maybe Maple and Aquod are both rated 5.0 out of 5 on the App Store, from 6 and 5 ratings respectively.
Do Maybe Maple or Aquod have ads?
Neither Maybe Maple nor Aquod shows ads.
Which is updated more often, Maybe Maple or Aquod?
Maybe Maple ships an update every 5 days, and Aquod every 2 weeks. Most recently, Maybe Maple was updated on October 30, 2026 and Aquod on November 9, 2026.

Other comparisons