Onigiri Subs vs Context
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
Onigiri Subs
Easily track and manage all your recurring subscriptions in one place. This straightforward application is designed for simplicity, making it accessible for anyone to keep tabs on their recurring payments.
- Subscription tracking
- Subscription management
- Simple interface
- Easy to use
Read full descriptionHide full description
just track your subscriptions it is that simple—even your grandma could use it!
Context
This AI-powered workspace allows teams to manage tasks collaboratively. Describe work in a composer, and watch an agent execute it live, keeping all conversations and documents in one organized place. It offers seamless integration with web versions and supports messaging, file sharing, and Drive browsing.
- AI-powered task execution
- Live agent work streams
- Team messaging and channels
- Document and Drive browsing
- Cross-platform synchronization
- File and photo attachments
Read full descriptionHide full description
Context is your team's AI workspace. Start a task, watch the agent work, and keep the whole conversation in one place. What you can do on iPhone: - Start tasks anywhere. Describe the work in the composer and the reply streams back live. - Follow work your team started on the web. Every task, channel, and document in your workspace is here. - Message your team. Channels, DMs, and threads, with attachments from your camera, photos, or files. - Browse your Drive. Folders, documents, and everything your agents produce. - Sign in with Apple, Google, or your email. Context on iPhone is the same workspace you use on the web. Tasks you start here show up for your team instantly, and work started anywhere follows you. A Context account is required. Create one free at workspace.context.ai or in the app.
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is ratings volume: Context at 4 against Onigiri Subs's 1. Context also leads on device support (3 vs 1) and iOS requirement (16.4 vs 18.2). On price, rating, ads and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
On the App Store both sit at effectively the same score — 5.0 for Onigiri Subs against 5.0 for Context. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 1 and 4 respectively.
| Parameter | Onigiri Subs | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | 5.0 (1 ratings) | 5.0 (4 ratings) |
| Positive reviews | 100.0% of reviews | — |
| Number of ratings | 1 | 4 — better |
| Update frequency | — | Every 3 days |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Monetization | Free | Free |
| Devices | iPhone | iPhone, iPad, Apple Watch — better |
| Requires iOS | 18.2 | 16.4 — better |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 5 MB | 55 MB |
| Age rating | 17+ | 4+ |
| Developer | Faiz Anwar Shaikh | Joseph Semrai |
Customer experience
Onigiri Subs
Context
In-app purchases
Onigiri Subs
No in-app purchases
Context
No in-app purchases
