Comparison

Co vs FlightDeck PAX

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Co

Features
Read full description

Tools and features to help you in your flying adventures. Including reading out customisable checklists, backup flight instruments, flight timer and kneeboard

About

FlightDeck PAX

Features
Read full description

From the creators of FlightDeck EFB comes PAX, the essential tool for UK pilots to create and manage passenger declarations whilst conducting cost-sharing flights. Create, sign, and manage compliant passenger declaration forms directly on your iPad or iPhone with no subscription just a one time purchase. Key Features: • CAA-Compliant Forms - Generate CAP-1590 compliant declaration forms that meet UK Civil Aviation Authority requirements for cost-sharing flights • Complete Digital Workflow - Enter flight details, pilot information, and passenger data in an intuitive, step-by-step interface • Digital Signatures - Collect passenger and pilot signatures directly on your device using Apple Pencil or finger • Professional PDFs - Generate shareable PDF documents with all flight details, passenger declarations, and signatures • Secure Storage - Keep completed declarations organised on your device with Face ID/Touch ID app lock protection • Smart Organisation - Track declaration status from draft to completion, with automatic validation of required fields • Backup & Export - Easily export PDFs via email, AirDrop, or cloud storage to meet the 6-month retention requirement • Pre-fill Defaults - Save your pilot and aircraft details to speed up future declarations Important: This app generates forms based on UK CAA CAP-1590 guidance (October 2025). Users are responsible for ensuring documents meet their specific regulatory requirements. All data is stored locally on your device - no cloud sync or online storage is used. Essential Passenger Information Included: Each declaration includes all required CAA guidance on cost-sharing regulations, aircraft airworthiness standards, pilot qualifications, and passenger acknowledgements. Stay Compliant, Stay Organised PAX streamlines the declaration process while ensuring you meet all regulatory requirements for cost-sharing flights in the UK.

Screenshots

Co4 screens
FlightDeck PAX4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is price: Co at Free against FlightDeck PAX's $4.99. Co also leads on update cadence (every 4 days vs every 5 weeks). On ads, in-app purchases, device support and iOS requirement there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Co is free to download; FlightDeck PAX costs $4.99 up front. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

Co ships an update every 4 days, FlightDeck PAX every 5 weeks. The most recent releases landed on September 8, 2026 and July 31, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard2 real differences · 4 level
Co versus FlightDeck PAX: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterCoFlightDeck PAX
PriceFree — better$4.99
Update frequencyEvery 4 days — betterEvery 5 weeks
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
DevicesiPhoneiPhone, iPad — better
Requires iOS1817.0 — better
Further details — not scored
Size1 MB1 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperVenture 2 RDC LimitedGNK Softworks Ltd

In-app purchases

None

Co

No in-app purchases

None

FlightDeck PAX

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is Co free?
Co is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is FlightDeck PAX free?
FlightDeck PAX costs $4.99, with no in-app purchases.
Do Co or FlightDeck PAX have ads?
Neither Co nor FlightDeck PAX shows ads.
Which is updated more often, Co or FlightDeck PAX?
Co ships an update every 4 days, and FlightDeck PAX every 5 weeks. Most recently, Co was updated on September 8, 2026 and FlightDeck PAX on July 31, 2026.

Other comparisons