Comparison

PixelCipher vs HAMQ

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

PixelCipher

Features
Read full description

Introducing PixelCipher - Your Ultimate Solution for Private Photo Protection! **Safeguard Your Memories, Your Way**   Transform sensitive photos into encrypted files instantly with military-grade security. Store, retrieve, and convert images/files seamlessly while keeping prying eyes at bay.   **Key Features:**   **Advanced Encryption** - Convert photos to unreadable files (AES-256) in seconds.   **Dual Conversion** - Revert encrypted files back to original images anytime.   **Fingerprint/Face ID** - Ultra-fast access without compromising safety.   **Why Choose SecureVault Pro?**   "Finally, an app that lets me store ID scans and private moments without fear!" – Emily T. (5-star review)

About

HAMQ

Track satellite transits with real-time orbital data and receive clear pointing guidance. Decode SSTV images and audio, with AI-powered call log generation. Prepare for amateur radio certifications with an updated question bank.

Highlights
  • Real-time satellite orbit and transit prediction
  • Azimuth, elevation, and pointing guidance
  • Full SSTV mode support with auto-identification
  • AI voice recognition for automatic call log generation
  • Amateur radio certification exam preparation
  • Professional contact and voice log management
Features
Read full description

HAMQ is a field-ready amateur radio toolkit for satellite operators, SSTV listeners and everyday QSO logging. It combines satellite pass prediction, SSTV image workflows, AI-assisted log entry, QSL exchange and LoTW-ready record management in one app. Main features: - Satellite tracking: calculate passes with SGP4, view azimuth and elevation, and follow LEO or GEO satellites with pointing guidance. - SSTV tools: decode live audio or local files, recognize common modes such as Scottie, Robot and PD, and create SSTV images from templates. - Smart QSO logbook: record daily contacts, portable operations, FT8 and satellite QSOs with callsign, frequency, mode, report, time and grid locator fields. - AI-assisted entry: extract key QSO details from voice or text to speed up mobile and field logging. - ADIF and GridTracker workflows: import, export and connect logs with common amateur radio software workflows. - QSL and LoTW: manage Email QSL, card exchange status, LoTW settings and confirmation progress. - Exam prep: practice amateur radio certification questions where supported. HAMQ is built for radio amateurs who want a compact, practical tool for tracking satellites, decoding SSTV and keeping QSO records organized. 73!

Screenshots

PixelCipher4 screens
HAMQ4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is price: PixelCipher at Free against HAMQ's $3.99. HAMQ's advantage is iOS requirement (13.0 vs 15.6). On ads, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

PixelCipher is free to download; HAMQ costs $3.99 up front. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

Scorecard2 real differences · 6 level
PixelCipher versus HAMQ: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterPixelCipherHAMQ
PriceFree — better$3.99
Positive reviews—82.4% of reviews
Update frequency—Every 10 days
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
Monetization—Paid
DevicesiPhone, iPodiPhone, iPod
Requires iOS15.613.0 — better
Further details — not scored
Size3 MB185 MB
Age rating4+4+
Developer硕 王丽 张

In-app purchases

None

PixelCipher

No in-app purchases

None

HAMQ

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is PixelCipher free?
PixelCipher is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is HAMQ free?
HAMQ costs $3.99, with no in-app purchases.
Do PixelCipher or HAMQ have ads?
Neither PixelCipher nor HAMQ shows ads.

Other comparisons